Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

CASE OF GONCHAROVA AND OTHER “PRIVILEGED PENSIONERS” CASES v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 23113/08, 23123/08, 23130/08, 23137/08, 23143/08, 23146/08, 23149/08, 23157/08, 33921/08, 35054/08, ... • ECHR ID: 001-95089

Document date: October 15, 2009

  • Inbound citations: 19
  • Cited paragraphs: 3
  • Outbound citations: 4

CASE OF GONCHAROVA AND OTHER “PRIVILEGED PENSIONERS” CASES v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 23113/08, 23123/08, 23130/08, 23137/08, 23143/08, 23146/08, 23149/08, 23157/08, 33921/08, 35054/08, ... • ECHR ID: 001-95089

Document date: October 15, 2009

Cited paragraphs only

FIRST SECTION

CASE OF GONCHAROVA AND OTHERS and 6 8 other “Privileged pensioners” cases v. RUSSIA

( Applications nos . 23113/08, 23123/08, 23130/08, 23137/08, 23143/08, 23146/08, 23149/08, 23157/08, 33921/08, 35054/08, 35068/08, 35073/08, 35130/08, 35189/08, 35194/08, 35197/08, 35222/08, 35234/08, 35244/08, 35249/08, 35255/08, 35257/08, 37978/08, 38012/08, 38130/08, 38147/08, 38152/08, 41789/08, 41791/08, 41792/08, 41793/08, 41797/08, 41801/08, 41811/08, 41812/08, 41813/08, 41816/08, 41818/08, 41831/08, 41878/08, 41882/08, 41885/08, 41887/08, 41889/08, 41892/08, 41894/08, 41898/08, 41908/08, 41909/08, 41915/08, 41918/08, 41980/08, 41983/08, 41987/08, 41989/08, 41994/08, 41998/08, 42008 /08, 42010/08, 42013/08, 42015/08, 42016/08, 42018/08, 42020/08, 42021/08, 42022/08, 42023/08, 42024/08 and 42025/08 )

JUDGMENT

This version was rectified on 10 March 2010

under Rule 81 of the Rules of Court

STRASBOURG

15 October 2009

FINAL

15 /01/2010

This judgment may be subject to editorial revision.

In the case of Goncharova and Others and 6 8 other “ Privileged pensioners” cases v. Russia ,

The European Court of Human Rights ( First Section ), sitting as a Chamber composed of:

Christos Rozakis , President, Nina Vajić , Anatoly Kovler , Elisabeth Steiner , Khanlar Hajiyev , Giorgio Malinverni , George Nicolaou , judges, and André Wampach , Deputy S ection Registrar ,

Having deliberated in private on 24 September 2009 ,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE

1 . The case originated in 6 9 applications ( nos . 23113/08, 23123/08, 23130/08, 23137/08, 23143/08, 23146/08, 23149/08, 23157/08, 33921/08, 35054/08, 35068/08, 35073/08, 35130/08, 35189/08, 35194/08, 35197/08, 35222/08, 35234/08, 35244/08, 35249/08, 35255/08, 35257/08, 37978/08, 38012/08, 38130/08, 38147/08, 38152/08, 41789/08, 41791/08, 41792/08, 41793/08, 41797/08, 41801/08, 41811/08, 41812/08, 41813/08, 41816/08, 41818/08, 41831/08, 41878/08, 41882/08, 41885/08, 41887/08, 41889/08, 41892/08, 41894/08, 41898/08, 41908/08, 41909/08, 41915/08, 41918/08, 41980/08, 41983/08, 41987/08, 41989/08, 41994/08, 41998/08, 42008/08, 42010/08, 42013/08, 42015/08, 42016/08, 42018/08, 42020/08, 42021/08, 42022/08, 42023/08, 42024/08 and 42025/08 ) against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by 10 9 Russian citizens whose names and dates of birth are tabulated in the Annex (“the applicants”). The applications ’ dates of introduction are also tabulated in the Annex.

2 . In the course of the proceedings applicants Vladimir Nikolayevich Yeremin and Igor Mikhaylovich Semyonov died, and their relatives adopted the applications.

3 . The applicants were represented by M r M. Antonov , Mr I. Fedotov , Mr V. Glukhov , Ms O. Gurova , Mr G. Migay , Mr. Y. Pakin , and Ms L . Yerokhina , consultants from the Moscow Region. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr G. Matyushkin , Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights.

4 . In July–October 2008 the President of the First Section decided to give notice of the application s to the Gove rnment. I t was also decided to examine the merits of the applications at the same time as their admissibility (Article 29 § 3) . The Government objected to the joint examination of the admissibility and merits, but the Court rejected this objection.

THE FACTS [1]

5 . The applicants are pensioners who live in the Moscow Region. Before retirement they used to work in hazardous industry. They had a dispute with a pension authorit y about the scope of their privilege d pension s and appealed to the Region ’ s district and town courts.

6 . In March – November 2006 the court s held for the applicants and ordered the pension authority to re calculate the pensions. The court s based their finding on the Law on Labour Pensions. In May 2006 –February 2007 these judgments became binding and were executed.

7 . On the pension authority ’ s request, in October 2007– March 2008 the district and town court s quashed their judgments due to discovery of new circumstances. The court s found, in particular, that the judgments had ignored the interpretation of the Law on Labour Pensions given by the Supreme Court in December 2005 and March 2007.

8 . The applicants ’ cases were remitted for a rehearing and eventually dismissed.

THE LAW

I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS

9 . In view of the similarity of the applications in terms of both fact and law, the Court finds it appropriate to join them.

I I . ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION AND OF ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1

10 . The applicants complained under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that the quashing of the binding judgments was unjustified . Insofar as relevant, these Articles read as follows:

Article 6 § 1

“In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ..., everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by [a] ... tribunal...”

Article 1 of Protocol No. 1

“Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions. No one shall be deprived of his possessions except in the public interest and subject to the conditions provided for by law and by the general principles of international law.

The preceding provisions shall not, however, in any way impair the right of a State to enforce such laws as it deems necessary to control the use of property in accordance with the general interest or to secure the payment of taxes or other contributions or penalties.”

A. Admissibility

11 . The Government argued that the applications were inadmissible. The Supreme Court ’ s interpretation s of the Law on Labour Pensions revealed fundamental errors in the district and town courts ’ reasoning, and hence tho se judgments had had to be quashed . The quashing had been legitimate , lawful, and compliant with the principle of legal certainty. The quashing was aimed at a uniform and coherent functioning of the State pension scheme.

12 . The applicants argued that their applications were admissible. The quashing had been unjustified because the district and town c ourt s did take into account the interpretation of 2005 , and because the interpretation of 2007 had been given after the judgment s . In any event, a legislative interpretation of laws might come only from a lawmaker, not from a court. Besides, t he pension authority had missed the statutory time-limit for the quashing , and the court s had extended that limit without good reason.

13 . The Court notes that the application s are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention. It further notes that they are not inadmissible on any other grounds. They must therefore be declared admissible.

B. Merits

14 . The Court reiterates that for the sake of legal certainty implicitly required by Article 6, final judgments should generally be left intact. They may be disturbed only to correct fundamental defects (see Ryabykh v. Russia , no. 52854/99, § § 51–52 , ECHR 2003 ‑ IX ) . Quashing of judgments because of newly-discovered circumstances is not by itself incompatible with this requirement, but the manner of its application m ay be (see Pravedna ya v. Russia , no. 69529/01, § § 27–34 , 18 November 2004 ).

15 . In the case at hand, the domestic court s justified the quashing with the Supreme Court ’ s two interpretations of the Law on Labour Pensions.

As to the interpretation of 2005, t he Court considers that differ ing judicial interpretations of a law represent a ground for an ordinary appeal, rather than a discover y warranting a quashing of a binding judgment (see Yerogova v. Russia , no. 77478/01, § 34 , 19 June 2008 ).

As to th e interpretation of 2007 , the Court reiterates that newly-discovered circumstances are circumstances that exist during the trial, remain hidden from the court, and become known after trial. Since the interpretation of 2007 was posterior to the Town Court ’ s judgments, it did not justify the quashing either (see Yerogova , cited above, § 33).

16 . It follows that the quashing of the applicants ’ judgments was un justified, and that there has, accordingly, been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.

I II . APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION

17 . Article 41 of the Convention provides:

“If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.”

A . Damage, costs, and expenses

18 . In respect of pecuniary damage, the applicants claimed sums ranging from 384 euros (EUR) to EUR 10,447 . According to the applicants , these sums represent ed the difference between the pensions they had been receiv ing after the quashing and the pensions they would have receive d in their lifetime if there had been no quashing. The Government con test ed the applicants ’ method of calculation as having no basis in domestic law. They stressed that before their quashing, the judgments had been duly enforced.

19 . The Court rejects this claim in view of its speculative character (see Tarnopolskaya and Others v. Russia , nos . 11093/07, 14558/07, 19660/07, 30166/07, 46736/07, 52681/07, 52985/07, 10633/08, 10652/08, 12694/08, 15437/08, 16691/08, 19447/07, 19457/08, 20857/08, 20872/08, 22546/08, 25820/08, 25839/08 and 25845/08 , § 51, 9 July 2009 ) .

20 . In respect of non-pecuniary damage, the applicants claimed sums ranging from EUR 2,000 to EUR 10,000. The Government contested this claim as ill-founded.

21 . In respect of costs and expenses incurred before the Court, the applicants claimed sums ranging from EUR 4 to EUR 1,640. The Government noted that any possible award should cover only proven expenses.

22 . The Court reiterates that it is an international judicial authority contingent o n the consent of the States signatory to the Convention , and that its principal task is to secure the respect for human rights, rather than compensat e applicants ’ losses minutely and exhaustively . U nlike in national jurisdictions, the emphasis of the Court ’ s activity is on passing public judgments that set human-rights standards across Europe .

23 . For this reason, in cases involving many similarly situated victims a unified approach may be called for . This approach will ensure that the applicants remain aggregated and that no disparity in the level of the awards will have a divisive effect on the applicants.

24 . In view of the above, making its assessment on equitable and reasonable bases, the Court awards each applicant EUR 2 ,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage, and costs and expenses .

B . Default interest

25 . The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY

1. Decides to join the applications;

2 . Declares the applications admissible;

3 . Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 ;

4 . Holds

(a) that the respondent State is to pay each applicant or his or her estate , within three months from the date on which the judgment becomes final in accordance with Article 44 § 2 of the Convention, EUR 2 ,000 ( two thousand euros) , plus any tax that may be chargeable, in respect of non-pecuniary damage , and costs and expenses, to be converted into Russian roubles at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;

5 . Dismisses the remainder of the applicants ’ claim s for just satisfaction.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 15 October 2009 , pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

André Wampach Christos Rozakis Deputy R egistrar President

A N N E X

Application no.

Introduced on

Name of Applicant

Born in

Judgment of

Binding on

Quashed on

23113/08

08/05/08

Goncharova Lyudmila Anatolyevna

1955

25/05/06

18/07/06

14/11/07

Kazakova Galina Mikhaylovna

1953

25/05/06

18/07/06

14/11/07

Larina Larisa Mikhaylovna

1956

25/05/06

18/07/06

14/11/07

Ryazanova Galina Ivanovna

1952

25/05/06

18/07/06

14/11/07

Sergeenko Galina Viktorovna

1947

25/05/06

18/07/06

14/11/07

Eleyev Aleksandr Fyodorovich

1952

25/05/06

18/07/06

14/11/07

23123/08

08/05/08

Gavrichenko Tatyana Vasilyevna

1954

25/08/06

08/12/06

24/12/07

23130/08

07/05/08

Zhuravlev Konstantin Ivanovich

1935

28/07/06

01/09/06

12/11/07

Zhuravleva Sofya Nikolayevna

1935

28/07/06

01/09/06

12/11/07

Chuban Lyudmila Petrovna

1954

28/07/06

01/09/06

12/11/07

Savina Olga Aleksandrovna

1955

28/07/06

01/09/06

12/11/07

23137/08

30/04/08

Zamystskaya Lyudmila Petrovna

1950

05/07/06

18/07/06

12/11/07

23143/08

08/05/08

Zemzyulina Kira Aleksandrovna

1952

16/07/06

26/06/06

12/11/07

23146/08

10/05/08

Lisovskaya Raisa Georgiyevna

1945

04/08/06

08/12/06

26/11/07

23149/08

08/05/08

Pevneva Vera Yegorovna

1946

25/08/06

08/12/06

23/01/08

23157/08

08/05/08

Sizova Yevdokiya Andreyevna

1957

07/08/06

22/09/06

04/12/07

33921/08

20/06/08

Yerokhina Lyudmila Aleksandrovna

1946

13/09/06

28/12/06

26/02/08

35054/08

16/05/08

Vorobyeva Tatyana Nikolayevna

1959

14/08/06

08/12/06

28/11/07

Gendina Natalya Vasilyevna

1958

14/08/06

08/12/06

28/11/07

Rukhova Antonina Yakovlevna

1953

14/08/06

08/12/06

28/11/07

Stolyarova Tatyana Galyevna

1947

14/08/06

08/12/06

28/11/07

Chuvatkina Valentina Nikolayevna

1927

14/08/06

08/12/06

28/11/07

Sherkunova Lidiya Ivanovna

1951

14/08/06

08/12/06

28/11/07

Zharkina Alla Alekseyevna

1949

14/08/06

08/12/06

28/11/07

35068/08

17/05/08

Kuznetsova Galina Nikolayevna

1956

16/03/06

10/05/06

20/11/07

Platonova Larisa Viktorovna

1951

16/03/06

10/05/06

20/11/07

35073/08

17/05/08

Lyubimkina Tatyana Terentyevna

1948

12/07/06

25/07/06

20/11/07

Myasoyedova Lyudmila Sergeyevna

1950

12/07/06

25/07/06

20/11/07

Trusova Zinaida Vasilyevna

1945

12/07/06

25/07/06

20/11/07

35130/08

17/05/08

Antipov Valeriy Pavlovich

1951

21/06/06

26/10/06

29/11/07

Belyayeva Nina Mikhaylovna

1920

21/06/06

26/10/06

29/11/07

Bodatkov Aleksey Vladimirovich

1947

21/06/06

26/10/06

29/11/07

Yeremin Vladimir Nikolayevich

1952

21/06/06

26/10/06

29/11/07

Zemzyulin Yuriy Dmitriyevich

1953

21/06/06

26/10/06

29/11/07

Luchkina Marina Borisovna

1959

21/06/06

26/10/06

29/11/07

Rusakova Galina Ivanovna

1955

21/06/06

26/10/06

29/11/07

Sklokin Anatoliy Grigoryevich

1946

21/06/06

26/10/06

29/11/07

35189/08

17/05/08

Alshina Nadezhda Vasilyevna

1953

07/08/06

22/09/06

22/11/07

Makeyeva Natalya Aleksandrovna

1952

07/08/06

22/09/06

22/11/07

35194/08

17/05/08

Avercheva Tatyana Yuyryevna

1946

25/08/06

08/12/06

24/12/07

35197/08

17/05/08

Krasnikova Tatyana Nikolayevna

1949

05/06/06

04/08/06

20/11/07

Nesterov Viktor Borisovich

1955

05/06/06

04/08/06

20/11/07

Nesterova Irina Yevgenyevna

1954

05/06/06

04/08/06

20/11/07

Savchenkova Galina Serafimovna

1937

05/06/06

04/08/06

20/11/07

Vorobyeva Valentina Nikolayevna

1950

05/06/06

04/08/06

20/11/07

Lezhenin Vyacheslav Ivanovich

1949

05/06/06

04/08/06

20/11/07

Pyrkova Lyudmila Mikhaylovna

1956

05/06/06

04/08/06

20/11/07

Babarina Lyubov Ivanovna

1929

05/06/06

04/08/06

20/11/07

Babarina Tatyana Viktorovna

1957

05/06/06

04/08/06

20/11/07

Saprykin Anatoliy Nikolayevich

1950

05/06/06

04/08/06

20/11/07

Chernushkina Nadezhda Konstantinovna

1952

05/06/06

04/08/06

20/11/07

35222/08

17/05/08

Smirnova Olga Lvovna

1956

30/05/06

20/07/06

21/11/07

Golovan Vera Mikhaylovna

1958

30/05/06

20/07/06

21/11/07

Igolnikova Natalya Kirillovna

1954

30/05/06

20/07/06

21/11/07

Semenov Aleksandr Mikhaylovich

1942

30/05/06

20/07/06

21/11/07

Semenova Lyubov Ivanovna

1959

30/05/06

20/07/06

21/11/07

Semenov Igor Mikhaylovich

1923

30/05/06

20/07/06

21/11/07

35234/08

25/06/08

Zezegov Vladimir Alekseyevich

1936

20/11/06

02/02/07

04/03/08

35244/08

01/07/08

Subbotina Tamara Pavlovna

1944

16/08/06

08/12/06

24/01/08

35249/08

03/06/08

Kemenova Galina Ivanovna

1954

21/08/06

10/11/06

14/01/08

35255/08

05/04/08

Bykova Lyudmila Mikhaylovna

1942

31/05/06

04/08/06

23/10/07

35257/08

21/06/08

Sidorova Tatyana Nikolayevna

1955

12/10/06

21/12/06

21/02/08

37978/08

01/07/08

Medvedeva Kavsaria Khabriyevna

1929

28/09/06

21/12/06

05/02/08

38012/08

17/06/08

Lebedeva Nadezhda Trifonovna

1950

25/08/06

08/12/06

24/12/07

38130/08

08/07/08

Korobova Roza Aleksandrovna

1939

16/08/06

08/12/06

21/03/08

38147/08

03/07/08

Malyshkina Antonina Mikhaylovna

1932

28/09/06

21/12/06

05/02/08

38152/08

18/07/08

Trifonov Aleksey Alekseyevich

1951

29/09/06

02/02/07

20/02/08

41789/08

07/07/08

Pakin Yuriy Gennadiyevich

1945

28/09/06

06/12/06

24/01/08

41791/08

15/07/08

Smirnova Tatyana Dmitriyevna

1953

21/09/06

28/12/06

12/02/08

41792/08

01/07/08

Samsonova Nina Dmitriyevna

1934

04/09/06

28/12/06

11/01/08

41793/08

04/07/08

Ivashkin Nikolay Vasilyevich

1951

16/08/06

08/12/06

06/02/08

41797/08

04/07/08

Ivashkina Tatyana Aleksandrovna

1947

16/08/06

08/12/06

18/01/08

41801/08

17/06/08

Yevdokimova Maria Andreyevna

1930

25/08/06

18/10/06

13/02/08

41811/08

11/07/08

Lavrenov Nikolay Yegorovich

1944

01/06/06

28/12/06

12/02/08

41812/08

03/06/08

Melnikova Aleksandra Fyodorovna

1938

31/07/06

26/10/06

24/12/07

41813/08

24/06/08

Makarova Faina Mikhaylovna

1935

11/10/06

21/12/06

13/03/08

41816/08

14/07/08

Tyrtova Vera Konstantinovna

1958

13/11/06

28/12/06

28/01/08

41818/08

09/07/08

Aleksandrov Yuriy Ivanovich

1945

15/11/06

02/02/07

27/03/08

41831/08

25/06/08

Vasyunin Viktor Nikolayevich

1950

08/09/06

28/12/06

22/02/08

41878/08

13/08/08

Khakimov Boris Aisovich

1929

16/11/06

02/02/07

25/03/08

41882/08

13/08/08

Ukolova Tatyana Alekseyevna

1933

16/10/06

21/12/06

17/03/08

41885/08

11/07/08

Malyshkin Vladimir Ivanovich

1954

28/09/06

21/12/06

11/03/08

41887/08

30/07/08

Pimenova Vera Viktorovna

1944

19/10/06

21/12/06

28/03/08

41889/08

02/08/08

Bernikova Zoya Prokhorovna

1925

13/11/06

26/01/07

28/03/08

41892/08

27/06/08

Khismatulin Munir Khalilovich

1941

21/09/06

28/12/06

12/02/08

41894/08

09/07/08

Sesin Pyotr Grigoryevich

1937

25/09/06

28/12/06

24/01/08

41898/08

11/07/08

Matyukhina Lyubov Pavlovna

1954

30/10/06

28/12/06

31/03/08

41908/08

29/07/08

Savina Alla Mikhaylovna

1932

28/09/06

21/12/06

05/02/08

41909/08

30/07/08

Savin Viktor Petrovich

1933

28/09/06

28/12/06

19/02/08

41915/08

08/08/08

Gerasimova Tatyana Zinovyevna

1947

05/10/06

08/12/06

14/02/08

41918/08

06/08/08

Gusarova Tatyana Ivanovna

1959

17/10/06

21/12/06

28/03/08

41980/08

02/07/08

Shatilova Maria Aleksandrovna

1952

06/10/06

28/12/06

28/02/08

41983/08

17/07/08

Kuznetsova Klavdia Dmitriyevna

1925

20/10/06

21/12/06

23/01/08

41987/08

23/07/08

Yegorshina Yevgeniya Ivanovna

1928

11/09/06

08/12/06

25/03/08

41989/08

16/07/08

Teselkina Anna Yakovlevna

1948

09/10/06

21/12/06

31/03/08

41994/08

16/07/08

Teselkin Ivan Ivanovich

1944

09/10/06

21/12/06

31/03/08

41998/08

31/07/08

Malgina Zoya Sergeyevna

1952

17/10/06

21/12/06

31/03/08

42008/08

22/07/08

Popova Anna Antonovna

1934

15/09/06

28/12/06

31/03/08

42010/08

24/07/08

Shmeleva Nina Pavlovna

1927

17/11/06

28/12/06

31/03/08

42013/08

23/07/08

Spiridonova Rimma

Khuzakhmitovna [2]

1938

17/11/06

28/12/06

31/03/08

42015/08

05/08/08

Yermakov Vasiliy Sergeevich

1931

28/09/06

21/12/06

21/02/08

42016/08

30/07/08

Susaykova Natalya Ivanovna

1949

14/09/06

28/12/06

26/03/08

42018/08

09/08/08

Ivankova Natalya Mikhaylovna

1951

29/09/06

28/12/06

28/02/08

42020/08

13/08/08

Fortova Pelageya Sergeyevna

1940

30/10/06

21/12/06

25/03/08

42021/08

13/08/08

Yefimenko Zinaida Timofeyevna

1942

15/10/06

28/12/06

26/03/08

42022/08

29/07/08

Protasova Irina Igorevna

1952

14/09/06

28/12/06

26/03/08

42023/08

08/08/08

Morozova Valentina Vasilyevna

1942

13/10/06

21/12/06

05/03/08

42024/08

29/07/08

Kazantseva Neolinna Ivanovna

1940

30/10/06

21/12/06

26/03/08

42025/08

29/07/08

Bokov Yuriy Stepanovich

1945

09/10/06

21/12/06

27/02/08

[1] . Factual details concerning individual applications are given in the Annex.

[2] Rectified on 10 March 2010 : the text was “ Spiridonova Rimma Khuzamkhitovna ”.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255