CASE OF KONONOVA v. UKRAINE
Doc ref: 11770/03, 11325/10, 11826/10, 11976/10, 12892/09, 13482/10, 15301/10, 15601/08, 16144/10, 16644/10, ... • ECHR ID: 001-120067
Document date: June 6, 2013
- Inbound citations: 17
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 1
- •
- Outbound citations: 5
FIFTH SECTION
CASE OF KONONOVA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
(Application no. 11770/03 and 89 other applications)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
6 June 2013
This judgment is final. It may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Kononova and Others v. Ukraine,
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Boštjan M. Zupančič, President, Ann Power-Forde, Helena Jäderblom, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 14 May 2013,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in 90 applications against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by Ukrainian nationals, one Russian national (application no. 56464/07) and companies based in Ukraine. Their details are specified in the appended tables (“the applicants”).
2. In applications nos. 35771/07, 28061/08, 28071/08, 46953/08, 25260/09, 26397/09, 20032/10, 22620/10, 25288/10 the applicants died in course of the proceedings before the Court. Their next-of-kin expressed a wish to pursue the applications.
3. Mr Andriy Salnikov (application no. 28061/08) and Ms Diana Salnikova (application no. 28071/08) are brother and sister. They are both heirs of their deceased father and challenge the lengthy non-enforcement of the same judgment adopted in favour of their father.
4. The Government are represented by their Agent, Mr Nazar Kulchytskyy.
5. The applications listed in Appendices 1 and 2 were communicated to the Government on various dates in 2003-2011.
6. The Russian Government, having been informed of their right to intervene in the proceedings in respect of the applicant in application no. 56464/07 (Article 36 § 1 of the Convention and Rule 44 of the Rules of Court), indicated that they did not wish to exercise that right.
THE FACTS
THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE
7. On the dates set out in the appended tables domestic courts and labour disputes commissions delivered decisions according to which the applicants were entitled to various pecuniary amounts or to have certain actions taken in their favour. The decisions became enforceable. However, the applicants were unable to obtain the enforcement of the decisions in due time.
8. Some of the applicants also made submissions concerning factual and legal matters unrelated to the above non-enforcement issues.
THE LAW
I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS
9. In view of the similarity of the applications in terms of the principal legal issues raised, the Court finds it appropriate to join them.
II. THE SECOND APPLICANT IN APPLICATION No. 47387/06
10. The second applicant in application no. 47387/06, Ms Lyubov Rusanova, complains about delay in payment of the salary caused by her former employer (State agency) and about the outcome of the proceedings before the domestic courts. The applicant has however failed to establish that any salary was outstanding, and has in any event failed to show that she appealed against the sole decision in the Court’s file. The Court finds that this part of application no. 47387/06 must be rejected as inadmissible in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention.
III. THE STANDING OF THE APPLICANTS IN APPLICATIONS Nos. 35771/07, 28061/08, 28071/08, 46953/08, 25260/09, 26397/09, 20032/10, 22620/10, 25288/10
11. The Court considers that in applications listed in paragraph 2 (see above) the next-of-kin of the deceased applicants have standing to continue the proceedings in their stead (see, among other authorities, Mironov v. Ukraine , no. 19916/04, § 12, 14 December 2006).
IV. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 6 AND 13 OF THE CONVENTION AND OF ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1
12. The applicants complained about the lengthy non-enforcement of the decisions given in their favour and about the lack of the effective domestic remedies in respect of those complaints. Expressly or in substance they relied on Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
13. The Court notes that the above complaints (see paragraph 12 above) are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention. It further notes that they are not inadmissible on any other grounds. They must therefore be declared admissible.
14. The Court finds that the decisions in the applicants’ favour were not enforced in due time, for which the State authorities were responsible.
15. Having regard to its well-established case-law on the subject (see Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov v. Ukraine , no. 40450/04, §§ 56-58 and 66-70, 15 October 2009) the Court finds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of the prolonged non-enforcement of the decisions in the applicants’ favour. It also considers that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention in that the applicants did not have an effective domestic remedy to redress the damage created by such non-enforcement.
V. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF THE CONVENTION
16. Some of the applicants raised other complaints under the Convention which the Court has carefully examined. In the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, the Court finds that they do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols.
17. It follows that those complaints are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention.
VI. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
18. Article 41 of the Convention provides:
“If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.”
19. Bearing in mind its previous decisions on the matter (see Kharuk and Others v. Ukraine [Committee], no. 703/05 and 115 other applications, § 25, 26 July 2012), the Court considers it reasonable and equitable to award 3,000 euros (EUR) to each applicant in the applications which concern non ‑ enforcement delays exceeding three years (the applications tabulated in Appendix 1 with the exception of applications nos. 28061/08 and 28071/08) and EUR 1,500 to each applicant in the other applications (the applications tabulated in Appendix 2 and applications nos. 28061/08 and 28071/08). These sums are to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, as well as costs and expenses.
20. The Court finds that the applicants in applications nos. 28061/08 and 28071/08 are to be awarded 1,500 euros (EUR) each, as, being heirs to their deceased father’s estate in equal parts, they both challenge the non ‑ enforcement of the same judgment adopted in favour of their late father (see § 3 above).
21. The Court considers that the respondent State has an outstanding obligation to enforce the judgments which remain enforceable.
22. The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points.
23. The Court finally recalls that in the case of Kharuk it reiterated that it is an international judicial authority contingent on the consent of the States signatory to the Convention, that its principal task is to secure respect for human rights, rather than compensate applicants’ losses minutely and exhaustively, and that in cases involving many similarly situated victims a unified approach may be called for (see Kharuk v. Ukraine cited above, §§ 23, 24).
24. The Court considers that still further standardisation of awards in these cases is called for, and intends, in future judgments dealing with standard non-enforcement complaints against Ukraine, to award a single lump sum to each applicant, regardless of the non-enforcement period involved.
Loading citations...FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY
1. Decides to join the applications;
2. Declares application no. 47387/06 inadmissible insofar as it is made by Ms Lyubov Rusanova;
3. Declares the complaints of the applicants under Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the lengthy non-enforcement of the decisions given in their favour and about the lack of effective domestic remedies in respect of those complaints admissible and the remainder of the applications inadmissible;
4 . Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1;
5. Holds that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention;
6. Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to enforce the domestic decisions in the applicants’ favour which remain enforceable, and is to pay, within three months, EUR 3,000 (three thousand euros) to each applicant or his or her estate in the applications tabulated in Appendix 1 (with the exception of applications nos. 28061/08 and 28071/08) and EUR 1,500 (one thousand five hundred euros)
(i) to each applicant or his or her estate in the applications tabulated in Appendix 2 and
(ii) in applications nos. 28061/08 and 28071/08
in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants on the above amounts which are to be converted into the national currency at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 6 June 2013, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Stephen Phillips Boštjan M. Zupančič Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX 1
(non-enforcement delays three years and more)
No.
Application no. and date of introduction
Applicants’ name and date of birth
Relevant domestic decisions
11770/03
28/03/2003
Svetlana Sergeyevna KONONOVA
04/04/1957
Suvorosvkyy District Court of Kherson, 06/06/2003 as amended by the Kherson Regional Court of Appeal, 11/02/2004
17953/05
06/05/2005
Nikolay Ivanovich DOVGALYOV
19/09/1957
Tsentralno-Miskyy District Court of Makiyivka, 12/08/2003, as amended by the Donetsk Regional Court of Appeal on 04/12/2003
26918/05
06/07/2005
Nonna Igorevna PORTNOVA
27/12/1950
Commercial Court of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, 12/12/2002
18448/06
25/04/2006
PARITET LTD, TOV VKP
Kyiv Commercial Court, 19/02/2002
18673/06
22/04/2006
Valeriy Viktorovych SYNELNYKOV
25/07/1968
1) Romny Court, 20/01/2005
2) Romby Court, 21/11/2006
20933/06
13/05/2006
Lyudmila Fyodorovna BOBROVA
12/05/1963
Nova Kakhovka Court, 27/09/2005
34409/06
12/07/2006
Vasiliy Aleksandrovich TERNOVIK
18/01/1960
Novogrodivka Court, 21/12/1999
34596/06
02/08/2006
Stanislav Ivanovych PRUDKYY
30/05/1963
1) Military Court of Kyiv the Garrison, 09/09/1999
2) Bila Tserkva Court, 24/06/2005
41295/06
04/10/2006
Lyudmyla Viktorivna BURYAN
10/10/1939
Berdychiv Court, 18/12/2003
47358/06
18/11/2006
Olena Yevgeniyivna LYOVOCHKINA
26/09/1959
Zavodskyy District Court of Mykolayiv, 05/06/2001, having regard to the bailiffs’ misconduct as acknowledged by the Mykolayiv Regional Court of Appeal on 01/02/2006
47387/06
07/11/2006
Yelena Yevgenyevna GRYUNER
23/09/1958
Lyubov Aleksandrovna RUSANOVA
09/12/1948
Lenynskyy District Court of Zaporyzhzhya, 28/09/1999, rendered in respect of the first applicant
9229/07
06/02/2007
Olena Mykhaylivna PIKUSH
20/05/1941
Petrykivskyy District Court of the Dnipropetrovsk Region, 09/04/1996, having regard to the bailiffs’ misconduct as acknowledged by the same court on 08/06/2005
9356/07
12/02/2007
Mykola Yevgenovych TATARENKO
08/11/1959
1) Berezneguvate, 13/12/2005
2) Berezneguvate, 10/11/2006
3) Berezneguvate, 16/03/2007
19149/07
20/04/2007
Mykola Petrovych POPOV
30/11/1929
1) Berdychiv Court, 15/09/2006
2) Berdychiv Court, 28/09/2006
22887/07
11/05/2007
Mariya Fedorivna ODNOKOPYLA
22/06/1942
Podilskyy District Court of Kyiv, 17/04/2002
24362/07
26/05/2007
Irina Yuryevna TIMOFEYEVA
13/01/1959
1) Nova Kakhovka Court, 25/10/2004
2) Nova Kakhovka Court, 02/02/2005
25143/07
29/05/2007
Viktor Feofanovich ZATURINSKIY
08/04/1948
1) Labour Disputes Commission of the "Yuzhnyy Elektromashynostroitelnyy Zavod" OJSC, 11/11/1999
2) Nova Kakhovka Court, 02/03/2007
3) Nova Kakhovka Court, 15/05/2007
26676/07
15/06/2007
KONEKS LTD, TOV
22/08/1956
Kharkiv Regional Commercial Court, 07/12/2005
31465/07
23/06/2007
Yakiv Mykhaylovych GORDIY
17/01/1945
1) Kosiv Court, 30/01/2006
2) Kosiv Court, 04/09/2003
34772/07
11/07/2007
Vasiliy Nikolayevich KOVALENKO
16/03/1969
Boris Nikolayevich ADAMOVICH
19/10/1958
Tatyana Vasilyevna BRUSLINOVSKAYA
13/02/1961
Anna Ivanovna DANILENKO
28/01/1947
Yekaterina Nikolayevna DANILENKO
06/12/1983
Antonina Nikolayevna KRAYNYAYA
15/11/1951
Natalya Mikhaylovna KULAYEVA
20/08/1957
Applicant 1:
1) Krasnyy Luch Court, 13/11/2002
2) Krasnyy Luch Court, 01/06/2005
Applicant 2:
3) Krasnyy Luch Court, 27/09/2002
4) Krasnyy Luch Court, 06/06/2005
Applicant 3:
5) Krasnyy Luch Court, 31/07/2002
6) Krasnyy Luch Court, 16/05/2005
Applicant 4:
7) Krasnyy Luch Court, 18/05/2005
Applicant 5:
8) Krasnyy Luch Court, 18/05/2005
Applicant 6:
9) Krasnyy Luch Court, 03/01/2003
10) Krasnyy Luch Town Court, 18/07/2005
Applicant 7:
11) Krasnyy Luch Court, 09/12/2003
12) Krasnyy Luch Court, 07/06/2005
35771/07
20/07/2007
Lyudmila Pavlovna TOLSTOKOROVA
27/01/1937
1) Nova Kakhovka Court, 25/10/2004
2) Nova Kakhovka Court, 23/02/2005
35858/07
06/08/2007
Andrey Viktorovich MALTYZ
15/08/1972
Lugansk Regional Court of Appeal, 25/02/2008
40767/07
07/08/2007
Nina Petrovna PAVLENKO
26/02/1946
Pervomayskyy Court, 12/12/2005
44386/07
08/08/2006
Vitaliy Grygorovych PASYOVIN
18/07/1957
Bila Tserkva Court, 30/09/2005
51922/07
08/11/2007
Vladimir Dmitriyevich PUZENKO
15/01/1960
Crimea Court of Appeal, 17/04/2007
52743/07
12/11/2007
Marina Nikolayevna ISAYEVA
09/08/1964
1) Kyivskyy District Court of Odesa, 29/05/2003
2) Kyivskyy District Court of Odesa, 18/05/2006
56464/07
15/11/2007
Aleksandr Ivanovich KOLOSOV
26/03/1954
Krasnyy Luch Court, 23/03/1998
1865/08
15/12/2007
Nikolay Grigoryevich SHEVYCH
18/10/1952
Sverdlovsk Court, 27/05/2004
15601/08
21/03/2008
Aksentiy Platonovich DMITRASHEK
31/08/1940
1) Kirovske Cour (Donetsk Region), 31/05/2005
2) Kirovske Cour (Donetsk Region), 13/06/2005
3) Kirovske Cour (Donetsk Region), case no. 2 ‑ 533, 01/06/2006
4) Kirovske Cour (Donetsk Region), case no. 2 ‑ 534, 01/06/2006
20775/08
17/04/2008
Kateryna Fedorivna FESENKO
02/04/1949
Kyivskyy District Court of Poltava, 31/07/2002
27288/08
22/05/2008
Viktor Aleksandrovich MIKHAYLOV
31/05/1973
1) Krasnyy Luch Court, 22/06/2007
2) Krasnyy Luch Court, 28/09/2007
28061/08
05/06/2008
Andriy Sergiyovych SALNIKOV
24/12/1985
Military Court of the Kyiv Harrison, 27/02/2002
28071/08
05/06/2008
Diana Sergiyivna SALNIKOVA
05/02/1987
Military Court of the Kyiv Harrison, 27/02/2002
28090/08
16/05/2008
Andriy Mykhaylovych DANILOV
14/12/1966
Irpin Court, 23/11/2006
32466/08
12/06/2008
NAK, TOV
Kyivskyy District Court of Poltava, 16/03/2006
37355/08
28/07/2008
Oleksandr Volodymyrovych PECHONCHYK
01/07/1966
Volodymyretskyy District Court of Rivne Region, 16/07/2002 as modified by the same court on 26/06/2008 (in light of the judgments of the same court dated 05/06/2007 and of the Lviv Administrative Court of Appeal dated 11/09/2008)
46953/08
22/09/2008
Valentina Mikhaylovna MELNIKOVA
25/05/1931
Balaklavskyy District Court of Sevastopol, 23/06/2008
50872/08
19/09/2008
Ganna Oleksiyivna SITARUK
06/08/1926
Slavuta Court, 05/12/2002
61421/08
03/12/2008
Yevgeniya Trokhymivna GUTSOL
18/11/1937
1) Bershad Court, 27/04/2007
2) Vinnytsya Circuit Administrative Court, 15/09/2008
12892/09
19/02/2009
Anatoliy Grygoriyovych ARTYUKH
30/10/1948
Mukachevo Court, 12/03/2007, quashed in the light of newly discovered evidence by the Mukachevo Court on 24/12/2010
25260/09
21/04/2009
Vasyl Yukhymovych LEGKYY
11/11/1932
Tetiyiv Court, 19/11/2007
26397/09
04/03/2009
Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich MATSEGORA
19/04/1958
Slovyansk Court, 13/03/2000
32372/09
19/05/2009
Galina Vasilyevna OLENICH
01/08/1945
1) Slovyansk Court, 15/03/2002
2) Slovyansk Court, 12/04/2002
3) Slovyansk Court, 04/06/2003
33588/09
11/06/2009
Valeriy Fedorovych KRASYUK
13/09/1948
Chervonograd Court, 13/06/2005
38444/09
01/07/2009
Nadiya Mykolayivna MELNYCHUK
10/02/1958
1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005
2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007, Quashed By the Higher Administrative Court on 19/07/2011
3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007
44965/09
06/08/2009
Fekla Antonovna MUKHINA
20/12/1923
Antratsyt Court, 28/09/2006
46337/09
16/08/2009
ADEPT, PP
Sevastopol Commercial Court of Appeal, 28/11/2005, quashed by the Sevastopol Commercial Court of Appeal on 21/06/2010
53257/09
25/09/2009
Igor Viktorovych FEDOTOV
30/01/1964
Desnyanskyy District Court of Kyiv, 24/04/2008
54385/09
02/10/2009
Taisiya Kostyantynivna TATARETS
06/11/1940
Zavodskyy District Court of Dniprodzerzhynsk, 10/05/2006, as amended by the Dnipropetrovsk Regional Court of Appeal on 13/07/2006 and by the Supreme Court of Ukraine on 25/12/2008
54564/09
01/10/2009
Oleksandr Fedorovych SERDYUK
26/04/1962
1) Avtozavodskyy District Court of Kremenchuk, 04/09/2008
2) Avtozavodskyy District Court of Kremenchuk, 01/10/2008
54594/09
29/09/2009
Dmytro Grygorovych KAMENSKYY
11/05/1983
Pervomayskyy Court, 06/09/2007 as amended by the Kharkiv Regional Court of Appeal on 09/10/2007
59199/09
20/10/2009
Anatoliy Ivanovich RASKHODOV
24/06/1952
Labour Disputes Commission of the Lisychanskyy Zavod GTV , 14/06/2001
65102/09
27/11/2009
Vladimir Anatolyevich SENIK
27/01/1971
Kupyansk Court, 30/11/2001
67309/09
11/12/2009
Taras Yosyfovych GENTOSH
Drogobych Court, 29/12/2008
9993/10
04/02/2010
Vyacheslav Pavlovych OVCHYNNIKOV
27/07/1943
Mukachevo Court, 13/11/2006
11325/10
16/02/2010
Larysa Mykolayivna RYBALKO
26/03/1958
Yevgen Opanasovych RYBALKO
18/03/1955
Denys Yevgenovych RYBALKO
29/08/1981
Dmytro Yevgenovych RYBALKO
29/08/1981
Chervonozavodskyy District Court of Kharkiv, 22/11/2005
11826/10
11/02/2010
Galyna Oleksandrivna TARANENKO
30/03/1951
1) Pervomayskyy Court, 25/12/2007
2) Pervomayskyy Court, 26/02/2008
11976/10
16/02/2010
Anatoliy Danilovich MATVIYENKO
23/05/1943
1) Lugansk Circuit Administrative Court, 07/07/2009 as amended by the Donetsk Administrative Court of Appeal on 25/11/2009
2) Artemivskyy District Court of Lugansk, 08/02/2008 as amended by the Donetsk Administrative Court of Appeal on 12/06/2008
13482/10
22/02/2010
Aleksandr Vasilyevich MOROZOV
02/03/1958
1) Krasnyy Luch Court, 23/09/2008 as amended by the Lugansk Regional Court of Appeal, 10/12/2008
2) Krasnyy Luch Court, 03/09/2009 as amended by the Lugansk Regional Court of Appeal, 10/02/2010
15301/10
24/02/2010
Oleksandr Mykolayovych SAFONOV
19/03/1947
Valeriy Ivanovych MEDVEDEV
29/07/1946
Valentyn Fedorovych STOROZHENKO
07/09/1946
Stanislav Stanislavovych KUSHTAN
28/06/1941
Oleksandr Arsentyovych LISNENKO
06/12/1947
Sergiy Oleksandrovych ZAGLUSHCHENKO
08/06/1955
Applicant 1:
Kirovskyy District Court of Donetsk, 27/01/2009 (two judgments on the same day: 2a-3/09 and 2a ‑ 4/09);
Applicant 2:
Kirovskyy District Court of Donetsk, February 2009 (enforcement proceedings no. 11946771, enforcement writ no. 2a-64 issued on 16/02/2009);
Applicant 3:
Kirovskyy District Court of Donetsk, 16/02/2009;
Applicant 4:
Kirovskyy District Court of Donetsk, 12/02/2009;
Applicant 5:
Kirovskyy District Court of Donetsk, 08/12/2008 as amended by the Donetsk Administrative Court of Appeal, 04/03/2009;
Applicant 6:
Kirovskyy District Court of Donetsk, 28/01/2009
16144/10
03/03/2010
REAGENT, TOV
09/06/1989
Khmenlytskyy Regional Commercial Court, 14/07/2004
16644/10
09/03/2010
Vitaliy Vitalyevich DYACHKIN
14/08/1976
Tsentralno-Miskyy District Court of Gorlivka, 05/06/2009
17363/10
16/03/2010
Volodymyr Yuriyovych SIKAN
21/08/1968
Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 11/09/2007
17369/10
15/03/2010
Irina Mikhaylovna ROMANOVA
01/12/1957
Krasnyy Luch Court, 05/05/2004
17477/10
19/03/2010
Nadezhda Nikolayevna PALADIY
22/10/1952
1) Kerch Court, 06/08/2004
2) Kerch Court, 24/11/2004
17674/10
20/03/2010
Mykola Dmytrovych GRECHANYY
21/04/1949
Kharkiv Administrative Court of Appeal, 14/10/2008
20032/10
17/03/2010
Georgiy Ivanovych BILOUS
24/04/1926
Avtozavodsyy District Court of Kremenchuk, 26/06/2008
22620/10
25/03/2010
Petr Kuzmich KOVALENKO
11/07/1929
1) Kharkiv Regional Administrative Court, 17/11/2008
2) Balakliya Court, 20/07/2009
25360/10
23/04/2010
Vitaliy Gennadiyovych PANKOV
06/10/1972
Krasnyy Lyman Court, 24/11/2003
25363/10
23/04/2010
Ryta Vitaliyivna ADAMOVSKA
10/06/1967
Krasnyy Lyman Court, 24/11/2003
26232/10
20/04/2010
Mariya Ivanivna ARTYUKHOVA
21/08/1937
Velykyy Burluk Court,13/03/2008
26676/10
02/04/2010
Nikolay Nikolayevich YUKHIMENKO
17/09/1942
Court of Appeal of the Crimea, 30/09/2008
28834/10
17/04/2010
Grigoriy Vasilyevich ALFEROV
27/04/1960
Kharkiv Administrative Court of Appeal, 13/04/2009
29205/10
12/05/2010
Vladimir Stepanovich ANTOSHCHUK
15/04/1950
1) Torez Court, 27/11/2000
2) Torez Court, 07/12/2007
30803/10
17/05/2010
Nataliya Mykolayivna SAVCHENKO
12/01/1960
Darnytskyy District Court of Kyiv, 29/03/2008
42600/10
19/07/2010
Antonina Nikolayevna KOSHELEVSKAYA
03/04/1962
Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich KOSHELEVSKIY
03/06/1987
Simferopol District Court of the Crimea, 13/04/2001
51950/10
15/07/2010
Vita Grygorivna NIKITCHENKO
25/04/1983
1) Kharkiv Regional Commercial Court, 24/12/2008
2) Kharkiv Regional Commercial Court, 13/07/2009
65624/10
28/10/2010
Vladimir Aleksandrovich BORISOV
06/02/1958
Krasnyy Luch Court, 09/02/2007
66602/10
28/10/2010
Anatoliy Ivanovych ZHUK
12/06/1966
Zamostyanskyy District Court of Vinnytsya, 07/06/2006
66622/10
20/10/2010
Raisa Nikolayevna KORZH
23/02/1962
1) Labour Disputes Commission of “Zavod Mayak”, 01/04/2009
2) Selydovsk Court, 07/07/2008
66882/10
05/11/2010
Valentyna Mykolayivna KUCHER
03/04/1969
1) Svitlovodsk Court, 31/07/2006
2) Svitlovodsk Court, 22/12/2006
69639/10
11/11/2010
Petro Vasylyovych ZADERZHYNSKYY
15/07/1920
Dobropillya Court, 02/10/2007
5010/11
15/01/2011
Viktor Alekseyevich RASPOPOV
20/10/1935
Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 05/02/2009
APPENDIX 2
(non-enforcement delays less than three years)
No.
Application
no. and date of introduction
Applicants’ name and date of birth
Relevant domestic decisions
60679/08
26/11/2008
Vladyslav Valeriyovych AVDEYENKO
10/06/1977
Ternopil Court, 24/09/2007
50101/09
01/09/2009
Gennadiy Petrovych STROM
26/06/1965
Oleksandriya Court, 06/11/2008
51423/09
09/09/2009
Iryna Ivanivna SKOCHKO
07/03/1971
Oleksandriya Court, 27/02/2009
52625/09
08/09/2009
Olena Volodymyrivna CHAYKA AKA OSTAPENKO
10/05/1979
Oleksandriya Court, 27/02/2009
32380/10
03/06/2010
Nadiya Oleksandrivna ZAGYNAYLO
04/10/1965
Yuliya Andriyivna SLOBODSKA AKA ZAGYNAYLO
21/09/1986
Golosiyivskyy District Court of Kyiv, 19/03/2009
52748/10
04/09/2010
Iryna Dmytrivna ULYANOVA
06/08/1956
1) Zhovtnevyy District Court of Kharkiv, 22/06/2009
2) Zhovtnevyy District Court of Kharkiv, 22/02/2010, as amended by the judgment of the Kharkiv Regional Court of Appeal of 01/06/2010
55471/10
17/09/2010
Viktor Yakovych DRANYSH
28/07/1936
Donetsk Administrative Court of Appeal, 11/08/2009