LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
Sorry, there was an error communicating with our API.
Try refreshing the page, and if the error persists, please try again in a few minutes.
CASE OF MILLBANK AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Doc ref: 44473/14, 58659/14, 70874/14, 71699/14, 73574/14, 73638/14, 73771/14, 73783/14, 73909/14, 73911/14, ... • ECHR ID: 001-163919
Document date: June 30, 2016
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 4
CASE OF MILLBANK AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Doc ref: 44473/14, 58659/14, 70874/14, 71699/14, 73574/14, 73638/14, 73771/14, 73783/14, 73909/14, 73911/14, ... • ECHR ID: 001-163919
Document date: June 30, 2016
Cited paragraphs only
FI RST SECTION
CASE OF MILLBANK AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
(Application no s . 44473/14, 58659/14, 70874/14, 71699/14, 73574/14, 73638/14, 73771/14, 73783/14, 73909/14, 73911/14, 74403/14, 74409/14, 75735/14, 75846/14, 2294/15, 18149/15, 24868/15, 26031/15, 26045/15, 28688/15, 32681/15 and 32685/15 )
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
3 0 June 2016
This judgment is final . It may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Millbank and Others v. the United Kingdom ,
The European Court of Human Rights ( First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Robert Spano , President, Paul Mahoney, Pauliine Koskelo , judges, and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar ,
Having deliberated in private on 2 June 2016 ,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1 . The case originated in applications against the United Kingdom lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2 . The applications were communicated to the United Kingdom Government (“the Government”).
THE FACTS
3 . The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4 . The applicants, who are convicted prisoners, complained about their ineligibility to vote in elections.
THE LAW
I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS
5 . Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
II. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF PROTOCOL No. 1
6 . The applicants complained about their ineligibility to vote in elections. They relied on Article 3 of Protocol No. 1, which read s as follows:
“The High Contracting Parties undertake to hold free elections at reasonable intervals by secret ballot, under conditions which will ensure the free expression of the opinion of the people in the choice of the legislature.”
7 . The Court refers to the principles established in its case ‑ law regarding ineligibility to vote in elections (see, for instance, Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2) [GC], no. 74025/01, ECHR 2005 ‑ IX; Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom , nos. 60041/08 and 60054/08, ECHR 2010 (extracts); McLean and Cole v. the United Kingdom ( dec. ), nos. 12626/13 and 2522/12, 11 June 2013; and Firth and Others v. the United Kingdom , nos. 47784/09, 47806/09, 47812/09, 47818/09, 47829/09, 49001/09, 49007/09, 49018/09, 49033/09 and 49036/09, 12 August 2014 ).
8 . In the leading cases of Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2) and Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom , both cited above, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
9 . Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the statutory ban on prisoners voting in elections is, by reason of its blanket character, incompatible with Article 3 of Protocol No. 1.
10 . These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1.
III. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
11 . Article 41 of the Convention provides:
“If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.”
12 . Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see, in particular, Firth and Others v. the United Kingdom, cited above, §§ 19-22 ), the Court concludes that the finding of a violation constitutes sufficient just satisfaction for any non-pecuniary damage sustained by the applicants.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT , UNANIMOUSLY,
1. Decides to join the applications;
2. Declares the applications admissible;
3. Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 concerning the ineligibility to vote in elections ;
4. Holds that the finding of a violation constitutes in itself sufficient just satisfaction for any non-pecuniary damage sustained by the applicants .
Done in English, and notified in writing on 3 0 June 2016 , pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Hasan Bakırcı Robert Spano Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1
(ineligibility to vote in elections)
No.
Application no./
Date of introduction
Applicant name/
Date of birth
Election Details
44473/14
21/11/2014
Joseph MILLBANK
19/07/1960
European Parliament 22 May 2014
58659/14
18/11/2014
Michael Christopher HORA
10/04/1966
European Parliament 22 May 2014
70874/14
30/10/2014
Kenneth SMITH
04/12/1963
European Parliament 22 May 2014
71699/14
06/11/2014
Kevin Alexander MATHERS
17/09/1987
European Parliament 22 May 2014
73574/14
19/11/2014
William Hugh LAUCHLAN
01/07/1976
European Parliament 22 May 2014
73638/14
18/11/2014
Steven Mc ARTHUR
24/02/1988
European Parliament 22 May 2014
73771/14
17/11/2014
Harry CALDWELL
22/02/1974
European Parliament 22 May 2014
73783/14
17/11/2014
Shaun Thomas Robertson LESLIE
07/02/1987
European Parliament 22 May 2014
73909/14
18/11/2014
Robert David ANDERSON
07/12/1962
European Parliament 22 May 2014
73911/14
17/11/2014 & 11/05/2015
Adrian RUDDOCK
04/01/1973
European Parliament 22 May 2014,
Westminster Parliament 7 May 2015
74403/14
18/11/2014
Christopher Andrew READINGS
28/09/1966
European Parliament 22 May 2014
74409/14
18/11/2014
Thomas MICHALOWSKI
24/01/1971
European Parliament 22 May 2014
75735/14
18/11/2014
John Christie Burnett WALKER
09/06/1965
European Parliament 22 May 2014
75846/14
17/11/2014
James STRATTON
18/12/1942
European Parliament 22 May 2014
2294/15
17/11/2014
Scott Francis BOWRING
16/04/1971
European Parliament 22 May 2014
18149/15
18/05/2015
Howard SIM MERSON
01/07/1962
Westminster Parliament 7 May 2015
24868/15
13/05/2015
Marcia Petra Julia WALKER
21/12/1973
Westminster Parliament 7 May 2015
26031/15
21/05/2015
Brian DICK
29/12/1969
Westminster Parliament 7 May 2015
26045/15
20/05/2015
Ian William Buchanan WILSON
11/07/1973
Westminster Parliament 7 May 2015
28688/15
28/05/2015
David Bruce PENMAN
15/01/1975
Westminster Parliament 7 May 2015
32681/15
12/06/2015
Paul SINCLAIR
19/06/1989
Westminster Parliament 7 May 2015
32685/15
18/06/2015
Guy EVANS
21/01/1969
Westminster Parliament 7 May 2015
© European Union,
https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026
