FIFTH SECTION

DECISION

Applica tion no. 27240/07 by Sande TRAJČ EVSKI against the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 2 November 2010 as a Committee composed of:

Rait Maruste , President, Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska , Zdravka Kalaydjieva , judges, and Stephen Phillips , D eputy Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above application lod ged on 22 May 2007,

Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

PROCEDURE

The applicat ion was lodged by Mr Sande Trajč evski , a Macedonian national who was born in 1926 and lives in Bitola . The Macedonian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs R. Lazareska Gerovska .

On 22 April 2010 the Court decided to communicate the applicant ’ s complaint concerning the length of a pension dispute. The proceedings began in 1989 and ended on 23 June 2007 (date of service).

On 28 May 2010 and 24 August 2010, respectively, the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicant agreed to waive any further claims against the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia in respect of the facts giving rise to this application against an undertaking by the Government to pay him 5,800 euros to cover any non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, which would be converted into Macedonian D enars at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and w ould be free of any taxes that may be applicable . This sum would be payable to the personal account of the applicant within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage po ints. The payment would constitute the final resolution of the case.

T HE LAW

T he Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no public policy reasons to justify a continued examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention).

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court unanimously

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

             Stephen Phillips Rait Maruste Deputy Registrar President