SECOND SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 34350/06 by Ahmet YEKSATAN and Others against Turkey

The European Court of Human Rights ( Second Section ), sitting on 13 S eptember 2011 as a Committee composed of:

David Thór Björgvinsson , President, Giorgio Malinverni , Guido Raimondi , judges,

and Françoise Elens-Passos , Deputy Section Registra r ,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 27 July 2006,

Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

PROC E DURE

The applicants are Turkish nationals who live in Şanlıurfa . Their names and dates of birth are indicated in the Appendix. They were represented before the Court by Mr M Güzeler , a lawyer practising in Şanlıurfa . The Turkish Government (“the Government ” ) were represented by their Agent .

The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the excessive length of proceedings concerning the registration of certain plots of land following cadastral surveys.

On 15 June 2010 and 20 April 2011 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Turkey in respect of the facts giving rise to this application against an undertaking by the Government to pay them EUR 16,000 (sixteen thousand euros ) jointly to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, which w ould be converted into Turkish Liras at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be free of a ny taxes that may be applicable. It will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undert ook to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case .

THE LAW

The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention).

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court unanimously

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

             Françoise Elens-Passos David Thór Björgvinsson Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant ’ s name, date of birth and place of residence

Name of representative

34350/06

27/7/2006

Ahmet Yeksatan

18/ 0 4/1965

Şanlıurfa

Bubo Güldiken

15/ 0 8/1955

Şanlıurfa

Ferit Keygi

18/ 0 9/1963

Şanlıurfa

Halil Güldiken

0 1/ 0 2/1960

Şanlıurfa

Mehmet Güzeler