SECOND SECTION

DECISION

Application no . 16848/07 Hasan RÃœZGAR against Turkey

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 3 July 2012 as a Committee composed of:

Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre , President, Guido Raimondi , Helen Keller , judges, and Françoise Elens-Passos , Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 19 March 2007,

Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

PROCEDURE

The applicant, Mr Hasan Rüzgar, is a Turkish national, who was born in 1969 and lives in İstanbul. He was repre sented before the Court by Ms F Yolcu, a lawyer practising in İstanbul. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

On 10 January 2012 the Court decided to communicate to the Government the complaints under Article 5 §§ 1 and 5 of the Convention concerning the applicant ’ s alleged deprivation of liberty and the absence of a compensatory remedy in the domestic system in that respect.

On 2 and 14 May 2012 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicant agreed to waive any further claims against Turkey in respect of the facts giving rise to this application against an undertaking by the Government to pay him 8,000 (eight thousand) euros to cover any pecuniary and non ‑ pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, which would be converted into Turkish liras at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be free of any taxes that may be applicable. It will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.

THE LAW

The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list pursuant to Article 39 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court unanimously

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

             Françoise Elens-Passos Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre Deputy Registrar President