Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

TERLECKI v. POLAND

Doc ref: 60618/10 • ECHR ID: 001-113952

Document date: September 25, 2012

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 1

TERLECKI v. POLAND

Doc ref: 60618/10 • ECHR ID: 001-113952

Document date: September 25, 2012

Cited paragraphs only

FOURTH SECTION

DECISION

Application no . 60618/10 Kamil TERLECKI against Poland

The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 25 September 2012 as a Committee composed of:

Päivi Hirvelä , President, Ledi Bianku , Zdravka Kalaydjieva , judges, and Fatoş Aracı , Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 27 September 2010,

Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

PROCEDURE

The applicant, Mr Kamil Terlecki , is a Polish national, who was born in 1988 and lives in Rejowiec Fabryczny .

The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs Justyna Chrzanowska of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the lack of access to a court on account of excessive court fees required from him for proceeding with his claim. In 2012 he sued the State Treasury for compensation for alleged damage resulting from overcrowding and inadequate living conditions in the Tarnów Detention Centre. The Lublin District Court refused to exempt him from payment of court fees and consequently , returned the statement of claim to him.

THE LAW

On 18 June 2012 the Court received the following declaration signed by the applicant:

“I, Kamil Terlecki , note that the Government of Poland are prepared to pay me, with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the above ‑ mentioned case pending before the European Court of Human Rights, PLN 13,000 (thirteen thousand Polish zlotys) to cover any and all pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable to me.

This sum will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. From the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

I accept the proposal and waive any further claims against Poland in respect of the facts giving rise to this application. I declare that this constitutes a final resolution of the case.”

On 10 July 2012 the Court received the following declaration from the Government:

“I, Justyna Chrzanowska , Agent of the Government, declare that the Government of Poland offer to pay Mr Kamil Terlecki , with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the above-mentioned case pending before the European Court of Human Rights, PLN 13,000 (thirteen thousand Polish zlotys) to cover any and all pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant.

This sum will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.”

The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application. In view of the above , it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court unanimously

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

FatoÅŸ Aracı Päivi Hirvelä              Deputy Registrar President

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846