PLAČKOVIĆ v. CROATIA
Doc ref: 29716/11 • ECHR ID: 001-119266
Document date: April 9, 2013
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
FIRST SECTION
DECISION
Application no . 29716/11 Marijan PLAČKOVIĆ against Croatia
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 9 April 2013 as a Committee composed of:
Elisabeth Steiner , President, Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska , Ksenija Turković , judges, and André Wampach , Deputy Section Registrar ,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 17 November 2010,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The applicant, Mr Marijan Plačković , is a Croatian national, who was born in 1965 and lives in Hrvatska Kostajnica .
The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. Stažnik .
The applicant ’ s complaints under Article 3 and Article 5 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention were communicated to the Government, who submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicant, who was invited to submit his own observations. No reply was received to the Registry ’ s letter.
By letter dated 26 November 2012, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 27 June 2012 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicant ’ s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The applicant received this letter on 11 December 2012. However, no response has been received.
THE LAW
The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue his application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case.
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court unanimously
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.
André Wampach Elisabeth Steiner Deputy Registrar President
LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
