Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

AYDIN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

Doc ref: 3470/09;30732/11;37455/11;51516/11;51517/11;51518/11;62711/12 • ECHR ID: 001-126777

Document date: September 3, 2013

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 1

AYDIN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

Doc ref: 3470/09;30732/11;37455/11;51516/11;51517/11;51518/11;62711/12 • ECHR ID: 001-126777

Document date: September 3, 2013

Cited paragraphs only

SECOND SECTION

DECISION

Application no . 3470/09 Mustafa AYDIN and others against Turkey

and 6 other applications

( see list appended)

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 3 September 2013 as a Committee composed of:

Peer Lorenzen , President, András Sajó , Nebojša Vučinić , judges , and Atilla Nalbant , Acting Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above applications, indicated in the Appendix,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

THE FACTS

A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. Additionally, the case and decision numbers of the impugned proceedings appear in the Appendix.

A. The circumstances of the case

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.

On various dates, the applicants initiated actions before various civil courts or civil proceedings were brought against them before the civil courts. Certain procedures lasted several years, however some proceedings are still pending before the domestic courts.

B. Relevant domestic law

A description of the relevant domestic law may be found in Müdür Turgut and Others (( dec. ), no. 4860/09, §§ 19-26, 26 March 2013).

COMPLAINTS

The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the proceedings before the national courts had not been concluded within a reasonable time.

Certain applicants also alleged violations of Article 1 of Protocol no. 1 to the Convention, the amounts awarded to them lost their value due to the length of the proceedings.

THE LAW

I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS

The Court first considers that in accordance with Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the applications should be joined, given the similarity of the facts and of the legal issues raised.

II. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION

The applicant complained that the length of the proceedings had been incompatible with the “reasonable time” requirement, laid down in Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which reads as follows:

“In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ..., everyone is entitled to a ... hearing within a reasonable time by a ... tribunal...”

The Court observes that the applicants asserted that the length of the proceedings had been incompatible with the principle of the “reasonable time” requirement in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. The Court found in Müdür Turgut and Others (( dec. ), cited above, §§ 58 and 60) that the Compensation Commission established by Law no. 6384, insofar as it is, a priori , accessible and capable of offering a reasonable prospect of redress for complaints concerning the length of proceedings. Accordingly, the applicants should avail themselves of the new remedy offered by Law no. 6384.

It follows that these complaints must be rejected under Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies.

III. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL NO. 1 TO THE CONVENTION

Having carefully examined certain applicants ’ complaints in the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matter complained of is within its competence, the Court finds that it does not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols.

It follows that these parts of the applications are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court unanimously

Decides to join the applications;

Declares the applications inadmissible.

Atilla Nalbant Peer Lorenzen Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

No

Application No

Lodged on

Applicant

Date of birth

Place of residence

Represented by

Notes

3470/09

29/12/2008

Mustafa AYDIN

01/01/1939

Diyarbakır

Naciye AYDIN

16/04/1941

Diyarbakır

Åž emseddin AYDIN

01/07/1933

Diyarbakır

Mehmet Arif ALTUNKALEM

Bismil Cadastral Court, E : 1974/10, K: 2008/22

30732/11

10/03/2011

Hezar BİNGÖL

01/01/1936

Diyarbakır

Mehmet Arif ALTUNKALEM

E ÄŸ il Cadastral Court, E: 2005/1

37455/11

12/05/2011

Ayten KIZILGÜL

05/05/1937

Diyarbakır

Hatice SÖNMEZ

03/12/1950

Diyarbakır

S ongül YILMAZ

01/06/1963

Diyarbakır

Gülperi AYDIN

10/01/1948

Diyarbakır

Necla IÅžIK

27/09/1953

Diyarbakır

Åžaban ATAMAN

03/06/1970

Diyarbakır

Selim ATAMAN

06/06/1948

Diyarbakır

Gülnaz ATAMAN

05/12/1950

Diyarbakır

Şadiye GÜÇLÜ

10/12/1966

Diyarbakır

Recep ATAMAN

15/01/1961

Diyarbakır

Åžeyh Davut TATARÄžAN

01/01/1959

Diyarbakır

Çiğdem TATARĞAN

01/01/1968

Diyarbakır

Remzi TATARÄžAN

01/01/1965

Diyarbakır

Mehmet TATARÄžAN

11/09/1972

Diyarbakır

İbrahim Halil TATARĞAN

01/01/1962

Diyarbakır

İsmail ATAMAN

06/01/1947

Diyarbakır

Ayten GENÇ

01/01/1954

Diyarbakır

Mehmet Arif ALTUNKALEM

Diyarbak ı r Cadastral Court, E: 1983/1

51516/11

06/05/2011

Basri ÇİFTÇİ

14/03/1946

Diyarbakır

Mehmet Arif ALTUNKALEM

Diyarbakır Cadastral Court, E: 1983/1

51517/11

06/05/2011

Åžeyhmus AYDIN

02/07/1967

Diyarbakır

Hatun YALÇIN

01/12/1929

Diyarbakır

Hanı m YANLIŞ

02/11/1930

Diyarbakır

Salih a USUN

21/05/1935

Diyarbakır

Belkisa KIZILER

01/01/1948

Diyarbakır

Aliye DAYAN

03/02/1951

Diyarbakır

Şükrü AYDIN

02/07/1963

Diyarbakır

Ferfur DER İ NCE

06/03/1932

Diyarbakır

Şaile GÜZELGÜL

13/03/1928

Diyarbakır

Mehmet Arif ALTUNKALEM

Diyarbakır Cadastral Court, E: 1983/1

51518/11

06/05/2011

Ayş an ÇİFTÇİ

01/01/1930

Diyarbakır

Hasan ALTINBAÄž

10/10/1956

Diyarbakır

Mehmet

Ç İ FTÇ İ

30/09/1962

Diyarbakır

Azize KAPLANER

10/10/1964

Diyarbakır

RevÅŸete

Ç İ FTÇ İ

01/01/1966

Diyarbakır

Kadri

Ç İ FTÇ İ

07/02/1971

Diyarbakır

Naif Ç İ FTÇ İ

07/02/1974

Diyarbakır

Zeynep Fİ DANBOY

07/02/1977

Diyarbakır

Mehmet Arif ALTUNKALEM

Diyarbakır Cadastral Court, E: 1983/1

62711/12

04/06/2012

S ultan

KOYUNCU

03/01/1952

Diyarbakır

Sultanzade ÇETİN

01/01/1951

Diyarbakır

Mesudiye AKTAÅž

04/10/1955

Diyarbakır

İ brahim Halil KOYUNCU

26/03/1970

Diyarbakır

Mehmet Sait KOYUNCU

26/03/1971

Diyarbakır

Fatma KOYUNCU

26/03/1973

Diyarbakır

Mehmet KOYUNCU

24/03/1976

Diyarbakır

Zeynep KOYUNCU

24/03/1978

Diyarbakır

Remziye KOYUNCU

26/03/1981

Diyarbakır

KOYUNCU Ahmet

01/04/1982

Diyarbakır

AyÅŸe K ARTAL

23/01/1989

Diyarbakır

Metin KOYUNCU

24/12/1990

Diyarbakır

Mehmet Arif ALTUNKALEM

Diyarbakır Cadastral Court, E: 2996/4

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 400211 • Paragraphs parsed: 44892118 • Citations processed 3448707