Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

KORCHAGIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 10926/06;17657/06;45125/06;54081/08 • ECHR ID: 001-146522

Document date: August 26, 2014

  • Inbound citations: 2
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

KORCHAGIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 10926/06;17657/06;45125/06;54081/08 • ECHR ID: 001-146522

Document date: August 26, 2014

Cited paragraphs only

FIRST SECTION

DECISION

Application no . 10926/06 Aleksandr Vasilyevich KORCHAGIN against Russia and 3 other applications (see list appended)

The European Court of Human Rights ( First Section ), sitting on 26 August 2014 as a Committee composed of:

Khanlar Hajiyev , President, Julia Laffranque , Erik Møse , judges, and Søren Prebensen , Acting Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on 26 January 2006 ,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

A. Application no. 10926/06, lodged on 26 January 2006

The applicant, Mr Aleksandr Va s ilyevich Korchagin, is a Russian national, who was born in 1974 and is serving a prison sentence in the Vladimir Region.

The Russian Government (“the Gove rnment”) were represented by Mr G. Matyushkin , Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights.

The applicant ’ s complaint under Article 6 of the Convention about the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings against him was communicated to the Government, who submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forw arded to the applicant, who was invited to subm it his own observations. No reply was received to the Registry ’ s letter.

By letter dated 17 December 2013 , sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 12 August 2013 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicant ’ s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The letter was delivered on 4 January 2014. However, no response has been received.

B. Application no. 17657/06, lodged on 22 March 2006

The applicant, Ms Zinaida Sergeyevna Khrustaleva, is a Russian national, who was born in 1952 and lives in Moscow.

The Russian Government (“the Gove rnment”) were represented by Mr G. Matyushkin , Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights.

The applicant ’ s complaint under Article 8 of the Convention about her family ’ s eviction was communicated to the Government, who submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicant, who w as invited to submit her own observations. No reply was received to the Registry ’ s letter.

By letter dated 17 December 2013 , sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of her observations had expired on 28 March 2013 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicant ’ s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The letter was delivered on 6 January 2014 but never claimed by the applicant.

C. Application no. 45125/06, lodged on 9 October 2006

The applicant, Mr Yevgeniy Ivanovich Rozhkov, is a Russian national, who was born in 1975 and is serving a prison sentence in Abakan, Khakassiya Republic.

The Russian Government (“the Gove rnment”) were represented by Mr G. Matyushkin , Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights.

The applicant ’ s complaint under Article 5 of the Convention about the length of his pre-trial detention was communicated to the Government, who submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicant, who w as invited to submit his own observations. No reply was received to the Registry ’ s letter.

By letter dated 17 December 2013 , sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 27 March 2013 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicant ’ s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The letter was delivered on 10 January 2014. However, no response has been received.

D. Application no. 54081/08, lodged on 4 August 2008

The applicant, Mr Konstantin Yuryevich Smetanin, is a Russian national, who was born in 1976 and is serving a prison sentence in the Vladimir Region.

The Russian Government (“the Gove rnment”) were represented by Mr G. Matyushkin , Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights.

The applicant ’ s complaint under Article 3 of the Convention about the conditions of his detention in a correctional colony was communicated to the Government, who submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicant , who w as inv ited to submit his own observations. No reply was received to the Registry ’ s letter.

By letter dated 17 December 2013 , sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 6 June 2013 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicant ’ s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The letter was delivered on 8 January 2014. However, no response has been received.

THE LAW

In accordance with Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the Court decides to join the applications.

The Court considers that, in the circumstances of the case , the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue their applications, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the cases.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case s out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases.

  Søren Prebensen Khanlar Hajiyev Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

No

Application No

Lodged on

Applicant

Date of birth

Place of residence

10926/06

26/01/2006

Aleksandr Vasilyevich KORCHAGIN

01/01/1974

Vyazniki, Vladimir Region

17657/06

22/03/2006

Zinaida Sergeyevna KHRUSTALEVA

01/10/1952

Moscow

45125/06

09/10/2006

Yevgeniy Ivanovich ROZHKOV

22/05/1975

Abakan, Khakassiya Republic

54081/08

04/08/2008

Konstantin Yuryevich SMETANIN

14/12/1976

Melekhovo, Vladimir Region

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846