Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

LANTUKH v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 49824/07 • ECHR ID: 001-152634

Document date: January 27, 2015

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

LANTUKH v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 49824/07 • ECHR ID: 001-152634

Document date: January 27, 2015

Cited paragraphs only

FIRST SECTION

DECISION

Application no . 49824/07 Alla Pavlovna LANTUKH against Russia

The European Court of Human Rights ( First Section ), sitting on 27 January 2015 as a Committee composed of:

Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska , President, Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos , Ksenija Turković , judges, and André Wampach , Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 27 October 2007 ,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The applicant, Ms Alla Pavlovna Lantukh , is a Russian national, who was born in 1940 and lives in Moscow .

The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr G. Matyushkin, Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights .

The circumstances of the case

The applicant complained, among other matters, about delayed enforcement of the judgment in her favour taken by the Lefortovskiy District Court of Moscow on 20 December 2006 .

THE LAW

By letter dated 6 February 2014 the Government ’ s observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply by 10 April 2014 .

By letter dated 23 May 2014 , sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submi ssion of her observations had expired on 10 April 2014 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicant ’ s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. However, no response has been received. The letter sent to the applicant returned to the Court as unclaimed. The Court notes that applicant did not inform the Court of any change in her contact details.

The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue her application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

Done in English and notified in writing on 19 February 2015 .

André Wampach Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska Deputy Registrar President

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846