GRIB v. RUSSIA
Doc ref: 41174/11 • ECHR ID: 001-154381
Document date: April 7, 2015
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 1
FIRST SECTION
DECISION
Application no . 41174/11 Konstantin Gennadyevich GRIB against Russia
The European Court of Human Rights ( First Section ), sitting on 7 April 2015 as a Committee composed of:
Khanlar Hajiyev , President, Julia Laffranque , Erik Møse , judges,
and André Wampach , Deputy Section Registrar ,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 27 May 2011 ,
Having regard to the declaration submitted by t he Government and the applicant ’ s acceptance of its terms ,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
1. The applicant, Mr Konstantin Gennadyevich Grib , is a Russian national, who was born in 1988 and is detained in Vladivostok .
2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr G. Matyushkin , the Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights .
3. The applicant complained about poor conditions of his detention and various shortcomings in the criminal proceedings against him.
4. By letter submitted on 15 September 2014 , the Government informed the Court that they proposed to make a declaration with a view to resolving the issues raised by the application. The Government stated their readiness to pay 8,000 euros (EUR) to the applicant as just satisfaction. The payment was to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, together with any costs and expenses incurred, as well as any tax that may be chargeable. It would be effected within a period of three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court. In the event of failure to pay within that period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment would constitute the final resolution of the case.
5. In his letter of 20 January 2015 , the applicant informed the Court that he agreed to the terms of the Government ’ s declaration .
THE LAW
6. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.
Done in English and notified in writing on 30 April 2015 .
André Wampach Khanlar Hajiyev Deputy Registrar President
LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
