THIRD SECTION

DECISION

Application no . 67239/12 Dojčilo MARKOVIĆ against Serbia

The European Court of Human Rights ( Third Section ), sitting on 30 June 2015 as a Committee composed of:

Ján Šikuta , President, Iulia Antoanella Motoc , Branko Lubarda , judges,

and Marialena Tsirli , Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 6 October 2012 ,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The applicant, Mr Dojčilo Marković , is a Serbian national, who was born in 1960 and lives in Čačak . He was represented before the Court by Ms S. Jokić , a lawyer practising in Čačak .

The Serbian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms V. Rodi ć .

The applicant complained under Article s 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the non-enforcement of a final domestic decision rendered in his favour against a socially/State-owned company .

The applicant ’ s complaints were communicated to the Government, who submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicant, who was invited to submit his own observations together with any just satisfaction claim . No reply was received to the Registry ’ s letter.

By letter dated 16 February 2015 , sent by registered post, the applicant ’ s representative was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 23 January 2015 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicant ’ s representative ’ s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The applicant ’ s representative received this letter on 23 February 2015 . However, no response has been received.

THE LAW

The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue his application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

Done in English and notified in writing on 23 July 2015 .

Marialena Tsirli Ján Šikuta Deputy Registrar President