Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

MIRZAKHANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 13986/05, 29140/09, 51269/10, 14509/11, 18309/11, 14208/12, 23724/12, 33390/12, 73421/12, 3040/13, 1... • ECHR ID: 001-170865

Document date: January 5, 2017

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 3

MIRZAKHANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 13986/05, 29140/09, 51269/10, 14509/11, 18309/11, 14208/12, 23724/12, 33390/12, 73421/12, 3040/13, 1... • ECHR ID: 001-170865

Document date: January 5, 2017

Cited paragraphs only

THIRD SECTION

DECISION

Application no . 13986/05 Efletdin Muratkhanovich MIRZAKHANOV against Russia and 16 other applications (see list appended)

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 5 January 2017 as a Committee composed of:

Branko Lubarda , President, Pere Pastor Vilanova , Georgios A. Serghides , judges,

and Fatoş Aracı , Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on the dates set out in the appendix,

Having regard to the decision to apply the pilot-judgment procedure taken in the case of Gerasimov and Others v. Russia (nos. 29920/05 and 10 others, § 218, 1 July 2014),

Having regard to the declarations submitted by the Government and the applicants ’ acceptance of their terms,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The applicants are Russian nationals whose names and dates of birth are set out in the appendix.

The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr G. Matyushkin , Representative of the Russian Federation to the European Court of Human Rights.

The applicants complained, among other matters, about the delayed enforcement of the judgments in their favour imposing various obligations in kind on domestic authorities and the lack of the effective remedies in respect of the non-enforcement complaint. Dates of the judgments, their entry into force and their full enforcement are set out in the appendix.

In the wake of the pilot judgment, on various dates in late 2014 the applications were communicated to the Government (see Gerasimov and Others, cited above, §§ 230-31, and point 13 of the operative part).

On the dates specified in the appendix the Government submitted unilateral declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by the applications.

In their declarations they acknowledged, in each case, the lengthy enforcement of the judgment in the applicant ’ s favour . The unilateral declarations further contained, in each case, the dates of the judgment at issue, its entry into force and its full enforcement, as well as an overall enforcement delay.

The authorities stated their readiness to pay to the applicants the sums listed in the appendix as just satisfaction. The payments were to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, and would be free of any taxes that may be applicable. They would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court. In the event of failure to pay the sums within the said period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payments would constitute the final resolution of the cases.

In their letters received on the dates indicated in the appendix, the applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the Government ’ s declarations.

THE LAW

Having regard to the similarity of the main issues under the Convention in the above cases, the Court decides to join the applications and examine them in a single decision.

The Court attaches particular weight to the applicants ’ express agreement to the terms of the declarations made by the Government. It finds that such agreement shall be considered as a friendly settlement between the parties (see Cēsnieks v. Latvia ( dec. ), no. 9278/06, § 34, 6 March 2012, and Bakal and Others v. Turkey ( dec. ), no. 8243/08, 5 June 2012).

The Court therefore takes formal note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. The Court further considers that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention and Rule 62 § 3 of the Rules of Court).

In any event the Committee of Ministers remains competent to supervise the execution of the terms of the friendly settlement as set out in the present decision (Article 39 § 4 of the Convention and Rule 43 § 3 of the Rules of Court). Further, in any event the Court ’ s present ruling is without prejudice to any decision it might take to restore, pursuant to Article 37 § 2 of the Convention, the present applications to its list of cases.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

The Court considers that the amounts proposed by the Government should be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides , having regard to the terms of the Government ’ s declarations, and the arrangements for ensuring compliance with the undertakings referred to therein, and the applicants ’ acceptance of the terms of the declarations, to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

Done in English and notified in writing on 26 January 2017 .

Fatoş Aracı Branko Lubarda Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

No.

Application

no .

Lodged on

Applicant

Date of birth

Place of residence

Representative

Date of judgment

Final on

Enforcement date

Enforcement delay as specified in the unilateral declaration

Date of unilateral declaration

Remedial offer

(euros)

Date of applicant ’ s letter in reply

13986/05

14/03/2005

Efletdin Muratkhanovich MIRZAKHANOV

04/03/1937

Pyatigorsk

24/12/2004

21/03/2006

17/09/2007

1 year 5 months 26 days

15/06/2016

1,460

29/07/2016

29140/09

24/03/2009

Mikhail Vladimirovich OVCHINNIKOV

05/12/1982

Perm

17/03/2008

27/03/2008

14/02/2011

2 years 10 months 18 days

31/05/2016

2,830

09/08/2016

51269/10

05/07/2010

Viktor Viktorovich KISHKEL

10/09/1959

Kaliningrad

Irina Ivanovna KISHKEL

23/07/1962

Kaliningrad

Sofiya Adolfovna KISHKEL

22/02/1938

Kaliningrad

1) 20/05/1999

quashed on 11/10/1999

2) 09/12/1999

quashed on 17/07/2000

3) 01/02/2001

28/03/2001

07/05/2008

7 years 1 month

14/07/2016

6,500 (jointly)

06/09/2016

14509/11

22/01/2011

Lyudmila Fedorovna DAVYDOVA

08/09/1955

Yaroslavl

Andrey Dmitriyevich KRYLOV

18/02/2008

02/06/2008

09/06/2014

6 years 7 days

14/07/2016

5,900

05/09/2016

18309/11

02/03/2011

Igor Anatolyevich STRILCHUK

29/11/1964

Moscow

05/11/2009

24/11/2009

22/05/2013

3 years 5 months 28 days

18/01/2016

3,420

09/03/2016

14208/12

11/02/2012

Marziya Galyanovna SHEVELEVA

15/07/1936

Chita

11/03/2011

06/07/2011

07/07/2014

3 years 1 day

18/01/2016

2,940

16/03/2016

23724/12

03/04/2012

Sergey Ivanovich GONCHAROV

19/01/1970

Moscow

01/04/2010

20/04/2010

29/03/2013

2 years 11 months 9 days

18/01/2016

2,880

29/02/2016

33390/12

14/04/2012

Aleksandra Konstantinovna ARONOVA

02/05/1932

Sokol

13/10/2011

23/10/2011

24/12/2014

3 years 2 months 1 day

18/01/2016

3,110

11/03/2016

73421/12

15/10/2012

Raisa Yevgenyevna ZHIGALOVA

04/08/1988

Syktyvkar

21/11/2011

08/12/2011

04/02/2014

2 years 1 month 27 days

18/01/2016

2,120

07/03/2016

3040/13

12/11/2012

Dmitriy Olegovich MALYSHEV

16/06/1970

Kaliningrad

15/09/2010

26/09/2010

17/12/2013

3 years 3 months

14/07/2016

3,160

14/09/2016

15685/13

31/01/2013

Yuriy Gennadyevich KONDRATYEV

18/04/1959

Ryazan

21/05/2009

09/07/2009

12/04/2013

3 years 9 months

14/07/2016

3,680

04/11/2016

25252/13

19/03/2013

Yuriy Grigoryevich GOLOVIN

25/06/1954

Pechora

Aleksey Leonidovich SHEVELEV

14/08/2008

26/08/2008

07/11/2014

6 years 2 months 12 days

17/02/2016

6,000

07/04/2016

39190/13

04/06/2013

Fedor Vasilyevich RUSSKIKH

27/02/1954

Izhevsk

11/04/2012

25/06/2012

20/03/2015

2 years 8 months 23 days

17/02/2016

1,340

22/03/2016

58566/13

26/08/2013

Darya Andreyevna KOMIRNAYA

21/02/1995

Volsk

Aleksey Borisovich VOLOGIN

15/03/2011

26/03/2011

15/08/2013

2 years 4 months 19 days

15/07/2015

2,340

26/08/2015

72348/13

09/11/2013

Ruzaliya Ivanovna AKMALETDINOVA

10/06/1965

Kazan

Flera Kamilyevna KHAKIMOVA

14/04/1983

Kazan

Alsu Railevna MINNIVALEYEVA

17/05/2005

Kazan

Yaroslav Teodorovich PODVA

19/03/2010

04/04/2010

24/07/2013

3 years 3 months 21 days

17/02/2016

3,240 (jointly)

08/04/2016

25541/14

13/03/2014

Dmitriy Yuryevich SHILKIN

01/05/1985

Syktyvkar

Aleksey Leonidovich SHEVELEV

08/08/2012

08/08/2012

10/03/2016

3 years 7 months 2 days

20/09/2016

3,510

16/11/2016

28403/14

21/03/2014

Yelena Viktorovna OVCHINNIKOVA

21/08/1971

Lipetsk

18/01/2012

29/02/2012

20/10/2014

2 years 7 months 19 days

17/02/2016

2,590

29/03/2016

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846