Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

KBILTSETSKHLASHVILI v. GEORGIA

Doc ref: 29873/07 • ECHR ID: 001-172703

Document date: March 7, 2017

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

KBILTSETSKHLASHVILI v. GEORGIA

Doc ref: 29873/07 • ECHR ID: 001-172703

Document date: March 7, 2017

Cited paragraphs only

FOURTH SECTION

DECISION

Application no . 29873/07 Tinatin KBILTSETSKHLASHVILI against Georgia

The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 7 March 2017 as a Committee composed of:

Krzysztof Wojtyczek, President, Nona Tsotsoria, Marko Bošnjak, judges,

and Andrea Tamietti, Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 25 May 2007,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

1. The applicant, Ms Tinatin Kbiltsetskhlashvili, is a Georgian national, who was born in 1952 and lives in Tbilisi. She was represented before the Court by Mr A. Gegia, a lawyer practising in Tbilisi.

2. The applicant ’ s complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 concerning the alleged non-enforcement of a final court decision were communicated to the Georgian Government who were represented by their Agent, Mr L. Meskhoradze, of the Ministry of Justice.

3. The applicant failed to respond to the Registry ’ s letter of 22 December 2015, served on her representative on 26 December 2015, reminding her that the period allowed for submission of her observations in reply to those of the Government had expired on 8 July 2005 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicant ’ s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention.

THE LAW

4. The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue her application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

Done in English and notified in writing on 30 March 2017 .

Andrea Tamietti Krzysztof Wojtyczek              Deputy Registrar President

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 400211 • Paragraphs parsed: 44892118 • Citations processed 3448707