YILDIZ AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Doc ref: 67974/11;14823/12;76957/12 • ECHR ID: 001-172920
Document date: March 16, 2017
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 1
SECOND SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 67974/11 Hilmi YILDIZ against Turkey and 2 other applications (see appended table)
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 16 March 2017 as a Committee composed of:
Nebojša Vučinić, President, Valeriu Griţco, Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström, judges,
and Karen Reid, Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The list of applicants is set out in the appended table.
The applicants ’ complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention were communicated to the Turkish Government (“the Government”) . In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.
The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Turkey in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court ’ s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases.
THE LAW
Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to join the applications;
Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention .
Done in English and notified in writing on 6 April 2017 .
Karen Reid Nebojša Vučinić Registrar President
APPENDIX
No.
Application no. Date of introduction
Applicant name
Date of birth
Representative name and location
Other complaints under well-established case-law
Date of receipt of Government declaration
Date of receipt of Applicant ’ s declaration
Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage
per applicant
(in euros) [i]
Amount awarded for costs and expenses per application
(in euros) [ii]
67974/11
28/09/2011
Hilmi Yıldız
10/08/1957
Ateş Nazlı
Istanbul
01/08/2016
07/12/2016
3,600
500
14823/12
20/02/2012
Süleyman Kılıç
20/10/1987
DoÄŸan Baran
Istanbul
Art. 5 (5) - lack of, or inadequate, compensation for unlawful arrest or detention - rigth to compensation
01/08/2016
05/10/2016
5,000
500
76957/12
21/09/2012
Pınar Çevrim
20/12/1986
Aydınkaya Fırat
Istanbul
25/08/2016
27/01/2017
3,100
500[i] . Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
[ii] . Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
