Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

ZHDANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 43077/12;18248/13;41280/13 • ECHR ID: 001-175556

Document date: June 15, 2017

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 2

ZHDANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 43077/12;18248/13;41280/13 • ECHR ID: 001-175556

Document date: June 15, 2017

Cited paragraphs only

THIRD SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 43077/12 Dmitriy Aleksandrovich ZHDANOV against Russia and 2 other applications (see appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 15 June 2017 as a Committee composed of:

Luis López Guerra, President, Dmitry Dedov , Jolien Schukking , judges,

and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,

Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

All of the applicants were parties to various civil proceedings. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the application s are set out in the appended table.

The applicants ’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning their absence from civil proceedings were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”) .

THE LAW

A. Joinder of the applications

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

B. Complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention ( applicants ’ absence from civil proceedings )

Under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention the applicants complained that they, as a prisoners, had been unable to attend court hearings in civil cases to which they were parties .

1. Applications nos. 43077/12 and 41280/13

The final decisions in the applicants ’ civil cases were adopted on 1 9 December 2011 (application no. 4 3077/12) and on 21 December 2012 (application no. 41280/13).

The applicants explicitly raised complaints about their absence from the civil proceedings in their application forms on 14 August 2012 and on 8 December 2013 respectively . Their application forms were dispatched on 25 August 2012 and on 24 December 2013 respectively.

In their first letters to the Court the applicants only invoked Article 6 of the Convention without formulating, even summarily, the complaints about their absence from civil proceedings (see Allan v. the United Kingdom ( dec. ), no. 48539/99, 28 August 2001, and, a contrario , Barankevich v. Russia ( dec. ), no. 10519/03 , 20 October 2005) .

2. Application no. 18248/13

The final decision in the applicant ’ s civil case was adopted on 3 May 2012 and was received by the applicant on 31 May 2012. Therefore, the Court rejects the Government ’ s arguments that the applicant ’ s first letter to the Court sent on 14 November 2012 was belated (see Kazantsev v. Russia , no. 14880/05 , § 35, 3 April 2012) .

However, the Court accepts the Government ’ s arguments that the applicant failed to comply with the instructions of the Court and respect the deadline for the submission of the completed application form. It therefore finds that the date of the introduction of the application was not the date when the applicant lodged his first letter with the Court, but rather the date when he sent the completed application form to it, which was on 31 May 2013 (see Walichniewicz and Others v. Russia ( dec. ), nos. 23617/09 and 3 others, 15 September 2016).

Therefore, the complaints about the absence of the three applicants from civil proceedings were raised more than six months after the respective final decisions.

In view of the above, the Court finds that these complaints are belated and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Declares the application s inadmissible.

Done in English and notified in writing on 6 July 2017 .

Liv Tigerstedt Luis López Guerra Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant name

Date of birth

Nature of the dispute

Final decision

First-instance hearing date Court

Appeal hearing date Court

43077/12

06/06/2012

Dmitriy Aleksandrovich Zhdanov

10/08/1979

non-pecuniary damages for unlawful criminal prosecution

08/06/2011

Kalininskiy District Court of Tyumen

19/12/2011

Tyumen Regional Court

18248/13

31/05/2013

Yevgeniy Valeryevich Skulyberdin

28/08/1979

non-pecuniary damages for unlawful criminal prosecution

10/02/2012

Kopeysk Town Court of the Chelyabinsk Region

03/05/2012

Chelyabinsk Regional Court

41280/13

21/05/2013

Valeriy Ivanovich Yefremov

18/01/1956

deprivation of parental rights

06/09/2012

Kem Town Court of the Republic of Kareliya

21/12/2012

Supreme Court of the Republic of Kareliya

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846