RUTA v. POLAND
Doc ref: 31007/15 • ECHR ID: 001-177110
Document date: July 11, 2017
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 1
FIRST SECTION
DECISION
Application no . 31007/15 Robert RUTA against Poland
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 11 July 2017 as a Committee composed of:
Aleš Pejchal , President, Krzysztof Wojtyczek, Jovan Ilievski , judges, and Renata Degener, Deputy Section Registrar ,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 28 September 2015,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
1. The applicant, Mr Robert Ruta , is a Polish national, who was born in 1975 and lives in Poznań .
2. The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Justyna Chrzanowska , of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
3. The applicant complained under Article 3 of the Convention about overcrowding and inadequate living conditions during his detention in Wołów Prison from 19 August to 1 December 2009 (3 months, 13 days).
4. On 6 June 2017 the Court received the following declaration from the Government:
“I, Justyna Chrzanowska , Agent of the Government, declare that the Government of Poland offer to pay to Robert Ruta , with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the above-mentioned case pending before the European Court of Human Rights, PLN 5,000 (five thousand Polish zlotys) to cover any and all pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant.
The payment is intended to provide the applicant with redress for the systemic violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the conditions of his detention, in particular overcrowding, as identified by the Court in the pilot judgment given in the case of Orchowski v. Poland (no. 17885/04) on 22 October 2009 (see paragraphs 135 and 147 et seq.).
This sum will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court to strike the case out of its list of cases. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.”
5. On 12 June 2017 the Court received the following declaration signed by the applicant:
“I, Robert Ruta , note that the Government of Poland are prepared to pay me, with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the above-mentioned case pending before the European Court of Human Rights, PLN 5,000 (five thousand Polish zlotys) to cover any and all pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable to me.
I further note that the payment constitutes redress for the systemic violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the conditions of the applicant ’ s detention, in particular overcrowding, as identified by the Court in the pilot judgment given in the case of Orchowski v. Poland (no. 17885/04) on 22 October 2009 (see paragraphs 135 and 147 et seq.).
This sum will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court to strike the case out of its list of cases. From the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
I accept the proposal and waive any further claims against Poland in respect of the facts giving rise to this application. I declare that this constitutes a final resolution of the case.”
THE LAW
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.
Done in English and notified in writing on 7 September 2017 .
Renata Degener Aleš Pejchal Deputy Registrar President
LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
