Search
document

Document text Analytics

ZAKARPATTURYST, PAT AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

Doc ref: 41939/14;42038/14;43041/14;43049/14;49481/14 • ECHR ID: 001-179917

Document date: November 28, 2017

Inbound citations: 2
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

ZAKARPATTURYST, PAT AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

Doc ref: 41939/14;42038/14;43041/14;43049/14;49481/14 • ECHR ID: 001-179917

Document date: November 28, 2017

Cited paragraphs only

FIFTH SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 41939/14 ZAKARPATTURYST, PAT against Ukraine

and 4 other applications

( see list appended)

The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 28 November 2017 as a Committee composed of:

Nona Tsotsoria , President, Síofra O ’ Leary, Lәtif Hüseynov , judges,

and Anne-Marie Dougin , Acting Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table ,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

A list of the applicant companies is set out in the appendix. They were represented before the Court by Mr R.V. Orekhov and Y.A. Voltarnist , lawyers practising in Zhytomyr.

The applicant companies ’ complaints under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 were communicated to the Ukrainian Government (“the Government”), who were represented by their Agent, Mr I. Lishchyna , of the Ministry of Justice.

The Government submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their observations in reply. No answer was received.

By letters dated 7 April 2017, sent by registered post to the applicant companies and by normal post to their representatives ’ contact address (a post office box), the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations had expired on 17 February 2017 and that no extension of time had been requested. Their attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention.

The letters to the applicant companies were delivered on the dates indicated in the appended table. However, no response has been received from either the applicant companies or their representatives.

THE LAW

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue their applications, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the cases.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case s out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases.

Done in English and notified in writing on 21 December 2017 .

Anne-Marie Dougin Nona Tsotsoria Act ing Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

List of applications

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant ’ s name and

the city of its registration

Date of receipt

of the registered letter

41939/14

26/05/2014

ZAKARPATTURYST, PAT

Uzhgorod

18/04/2017

42038/14

27/05/2014

ZAPORIZHTURYST, PAT

Zaporizhzhya

20/04/2017

49481/14

27/05/2014

ZAPORIZHTURYST, PAT

Zaporizhzhya

20/04/2017

43041/14

26/05/2014

UKRPROFTUR, PAT (UPT)

Kyiv

25/04/2017

43049/14

26/05/2014

VOLYNTURYST, PAT

Lutsk

18/04/2017

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant