Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

GLODEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 77924/11;56592/12;62836/15 • ECHR ID: 001-188965

Document date: November 29, 2018

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

GLODEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 77924/11;56592/12;62836/15 • ECHR ID: 001-188965

Document date: November 29, 2018

Cited paragraphs only

THIRD SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 77924/11 Aleksey Viktorovich GLODEV against Russia and 2 other applications (see list appended)

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 29 November 2018 as a Committee composed of:

Alena Poláčková , President, Dmitry Dedov , Jolien Schukking, judges,

and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table ,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of applicants is set out in the appended table.

The applicants ’ complaints, as listed in the appended table, were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”) , who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits.

By letters sent by registered post on the dates indicated in the appended table, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations indicated in the appended table had expired and that no extension of time had been requested. Their attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.

The addressees received these letters and did not reply or did not claim them at the post office (see the appended table). The applicants have not been in contact with the Court since the dates indicated in the appended table.

THE LAW

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications.

Accordingly, the cases should be struck out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases .

Done in English and notified in writing on 20 December 2018 .

Liv Tigerstedt Alena Poláčková Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant ’ s name

Date of birth

Complaints communicated

Time-limit for submission of the applicant ’ s observations

Date of strike-out warning letter of the Court

Addressee of the strike ‑ out warning

Report on reception

The latest correspondence sent by the applicant on

77924/11

29/11/2011

Aleksey Viktorovich Glodev

27/02/1971

Articles 3,

6 § 1,

6 § 3 (c)

05/02/2018

23/03/2018

applicant

r eceived on 11/04/2018,

no reply

15/05/2017

56592/12

08/08/2012

Roman Valeryevich Arestov

17/09/1975

Articles 6 § 1,

6 § 3 (c)

30/10/2017

23/03/2018

applicant ’ s contact person

returned to the Court as unclaimed on 30/05/2018

08/07/2013

62836/15

04/12/2015

Igor Alekseyevich Bogatyrev

10/06/1969

Articles 6 § 1,

6 § 3 (c)

05/02/2018

23/03/2018

applicant ’ s contact person

received on 16/04/2018,

no reply

05/08/2016

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846