ŠARAPAJEV v. LITHUANIA
Doc ref: 50966/15 • ECHR ID: 001-189524
Document date: December 13, 2018
- 2 Inbound citations:
- •
- 0 Cited paragraphs:
- •
- 0 Outbound citations:
FOURTH SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 50966/15 SergÄ—j Å ARAPAJEV against Lithuania
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 13 December 2018 as a Committee composed of:
Georges Ravarani, President, Marko Bošnjak, Péter Paczolay, judges,
and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 10 October 2015 ,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The applicant, Mr SergÄ—j Å arapajev, was born in 1975.
The applicant ’ s complaints under Articles 3, 13, 8 and 14 of the Convention about his conditions of detention, alleged lack of effective domestic remedy for his Article 3 complaint and his inability to receive conjugal visits while in detention were communicated to the Lithuanian Government (“the Government”) , who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits.
By letter dated 30 May 2018, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 6 April 2018 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicant ’ s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The applicant received this letter on 11 June 2018. However, no response has been received.
THE LAW
In the light of the foregoing, t he Court concludes that the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the application (Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the application.
Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.
Done in English and notified in writing on 17 January 2019 .
Liv Tigerstedt Georges Ravarani
Acting Deputy Registrar President