BADALOV AND ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
Doc ref: 35812/11 • ECHR ID: 001-204939
Document date: September 3, 2020
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 1
FIFTH SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 35812/11 Elmin Mehman oglu BADALOV and Anar Nurush oglu ALIYEV against Azerbaijan
( s ee appended table)
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 3 September 2020 as a Committee composed of:
Ganna Yudkivska, President, Lado Chanturia, Anja Seibert-Fohr, judges,
and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 7 May 2011 ,
Having regard to the formal declaration s accepting a friendly settlement of the case,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The list of applicant s is set out in the appended table.
The applicants, both journalists, were represented by Mr R. Hajili , a lawyer based in Strasbourg.
The applicants ’ complaint under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the alleged ineffectiveness of the criminal investigation into their alleged ill ‑ treatment by private persons was communicated to the Azerbaijani Government (“the Government”) . C omplaints based on the same facts were also communicated under Articles 10 and 13 of the Convention.
The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicant s agreed to waive any further claims against Azerbaijan in respect of the facts giving rise to this application, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amount detailed in the appended table. This amount will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court ’ s decision. In the event of failure to pay this amount within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.
THE LAW
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application.
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention .
Done in English and notified in writing on 24 September 2020 .
Liv Tigerstedt Ganna Yudkivska Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
Application raising complaints under Articles 3, 10 and 13 of the Convention
Application no. Date of introduction
Applicant ’ s name
Date of birth
Representative ’ s name and location
Date of receipt of Government ’ s declaration
Date of receipt of Applicant ’ s declaration
Amount awarded for any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses
per application
(in euros) [1]
35812/11
07/05/2011
Elmin Mehman oglu BADALOV
1989Anar Nurush oglu ALIYEV
1989Rashid HAJILI
Strasbourg
24/06/2020
24/05/2020
8,000
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
