Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

PIŞCOCI AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

Doc ref: 19749/16;19754/16;20691/16;21232/16;23709/16;27975/16;42831/16;44500/16 • ECHR ID: 001-205710

Document date: September 29, 2020

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 4

PIŞCOCI AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

Doc ref: 19749/16;19754/16;20691/16;21232/16;23709/16;27975/16;42831/16;44500/16 • ECHR ID: 001-205710

Document date: September 29, 2020

Cited paragraphs only

FOURTH SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 19749/16 Doru-Sorin PIÅžCOCI against Romania and 7 other applications

( s ee appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 29 September 2020 as a Committee composed of:

Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström , President, Georges Ravarani , Jolien Schukking , judges,

and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application s lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,

Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicants,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of applicant s is set out in the appended table.

The applicants ’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”) .

THE LAW

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows:

“No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”

The Government pleaded that the applicants had lost their victim status due to the fact that they had benefitted from the remedy offered by Law no. 169/2017 amending and completing Law no. 254/2013 on the execution of sentences. They asked the Court to reject the present applications for being incompatible ratione personae with the provisions of the Convention.

The applicants disagreed claiming that the compensation awarded to them had not been sufficient.

The Court notes that, in its recent decision Dîrjan and Ştefan v. Romania (( dec. ), nos. 14224/15 and 50977/15, 15 April 2020) it has examined similar applications as the ones in the present case and declared them inadmissible considering that the applicants had lost their victim status. The Court noted that Law no. 169/2017 amending and completing Law no. 254/2013 on the execution of sentences, adopted following the pilot judgment in the case of Rezmiveș and Others v. Romania (nos. 61467/12 and 3 others, 25 April 2017) and in force between October 2017 and December 2019, had been an effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention in Romanian prisons. More specifically, the above law had set forth a compensatory remedy, available for periods of detention ranging from 2012 to 2019 and allowing the deduction of six days for 30 days spent in conditions of detention that fell short of standards compatible with Article 3 of the Convention (see Dîrjan and Ştefan , cited above, § 28). This benefit had impacted on the term of the prison sentences giving the detainees the opportunity of earlier release on parole.

Turning to the circumstances of the present cases, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on their admissibility. The above-mentioned remedy was available to the applicants in the present applications and, indeed, they benefitted from it. Thus, on different dates, the domestic authorities, applying the provisions described in the abovementioned decision Dîrjan and Ştefan , awarded compensation, through the reduction of days, to the applicants for the entire period of detention spent in inadequate conditions of which they complained (for further details see the appended table).

The Court is therefore satisfied that the applicants have been afforded adequate redress and can no longer claim to be victims of a violation of their rights under Article 3 of the Convention. It follows that the applications are incompatible ratione personae with the provisions of the Convention and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Declares the applications inadmissible.

Done in English and notified in writing on 22 October 2020 .

Liv Tigerstedt Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention ( inadequate conditions of detention )

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant ’ s name

Date of birth

Representative ’ s name and location

Facility

Start and end date

Duration

Domestic compensation awarded (in days)

based on total period calculated domestically

19749/16

04/05/2016

Doru-Sorin PIÅžCOCI

15/12/1970

Codlea and Rahova Prisons

23/04/2015 to 24/11/2016

1 year and 7 months and 3 days

192 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent in inadequate conditions between 23/04/2015 - 06/02/2018

19754/16

03/05/2016

Nicolae-Dorin VUCU

27/06/1969

Arad Prison

19/10/2015 to 19/07/2016

9 months

90 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent in inadequate conditions between 25/09/2015 - 19/10/2017

20691/16

16/08/2016

Emanoil LEPĂDATU

24/06/1950

Irina Maria Peter

Bucharest

Rahova and Jilava Prisons

03/11/2014 to 02/04/2018

3 years and 4 months and 29 days

270 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent in inadequate conditions between 03/11/2014 - 03/08/2018

21232/16

09/05/2016

Cristian- Alexandru CRĂCIUN

14/01/1990

Oradea, Iași and Vaslui Prisons

20/02/2015 to 22/07/2016

1 year and 5 months and 1 day

210 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent in inadequate conditions between 20/02/2015 - 21/02/2018

23709/16

28/11/2016

Ionel-Doru CĂLINA

14/05/1971

Craiova Prison

14/05/2014 to 09/07/2017

3 years and 1 month and 26 days

246 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent in inadequate conditions between 14/05/2014 - 19/12/2017

27975/16

11/08/2016

Viorel BURLACU

18/04/1987

Irina Maria Peter

Bucharest

Gala ţ i and Br ă ila Prisons

06/10/2013 to 04/09/2018

4 years and 10 months and 30 days

426 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent in inadequate conditions between 16/10/2012 - 04/09/2018

42831/16

01/10/2016

Aurel MĂGĂLĂU

08/07/1963

Vasile RareÈ™ Biro

Satu Mare

Baia Mare Prison

18/05/2016 to 14/11/2017

1 year and 5 months and 28 days

102 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent in inadequate conditions between 18/05/2016 - 14/11/2017

44500/16

26/07/2016

Gabi BALTÄ‚

25/02/1962

Ionela Mărgărit

Bucharest

Gala ţ i , Gherla and Br ă ila Prisons

04/03/2015 to 05/12/2017

2 years and 9 months and 2 days

198 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent in inadequate conditions between 04/03/2015 - 05/12/2017

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846