LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
Sorry, there was an error communicating with our API.
Try refreshing the page, and if the error persists, please try again in a few minutes.
ZANET AND DIANCU v. ROMANIA
Doc ref: 42862/16;17661/17 • ECHR ID: 001-208475
Document date: February 4, 2021
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
ZANET AND DIANCU v. ROMANIA
Doc ref: 42862/16;17661/17 • ECHR ID: 001-208475
Document date: February 4, 2021
Cited paragraphs only
FOURTH SECTION
DECISION
Application s no s . 42862/16 and 17661/17 Niculae ZANET against Romania and Marius-Marian DIANCU against Romania (see appended table)
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 4 February 2021 as a Committee composed of:
Armen Harutyunyan, President, Jolien Schukking , Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application s lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix.
The applicants ’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received by the Court.
By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations or of certain requested information had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants ’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.
No reply to these letters has been received by the Court (see details in the appended table) and there are no previous letters from the applicants informing the Court about a change of address.
THE LAW
Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.
In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications.
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list .
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to join the applications;
Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases.
Done in English and notified in writing on 25 February 2021 .
{signature_p_2}
Viktoriya Maradudina Armen Harutyunyan Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention
( inadequate conditions of detention )
No.
Application no. Date of introduction
Applicant ’ s name
Year of birth
Date of the
applicant ’ s
last letter
Date of the Court ’ s
registered letter
Date of receipt of the
registered letter
New time-limit for
submission of observations
by the applicant
Date of the
applicant ’ s
release from prison
42862/16
16/08/2016
Niculae ZANET
1979
04/01/2017
01/07/2020
16/07/2020
Illegible signature
12/08/2020
In detention at
Slobozia Prison
17661/17
06/04/2017
Marius-Marian DIANCU
1981
12/07/2017
22/06/2020
06/03/2020
Illegible signature
03/08/2020
In detention at
Giurgiu Prison
© European Union,
https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026
