LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
Sorry, there was an error communicating with our API.
Try refreshing the page, and if the error persists, please try again in a few minutes.
SAVIN AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
Doc ref: 37480/16;42340/16;55793/16 • ECHR ID: 001-209514
Document date: March 25, 2021
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
SAVIN AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
Doc ref: 37480/16;42340/16;55793/16 • ECHR ID: 001-209514
Document date: March 25, 2021
Cited paragraphs only
FOURTH SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 37480/16 Ionuţ -Silviu SAVIN against Romania and 2 other applications
(s ee appended table)
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 25 March 2021 as a Committee composed of:
Armen Harutyunyan, President, Jolien Schukking , Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application s lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix.
The applicants ’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received by the Court.
By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants ’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.
No reply to these letters has been received by the Court (see details in the appended table). The applicants have been released from prison.
THE LAW
Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.
In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications.
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to join the applications;
Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases.
Done in English and notified in writing on 15 April 2021 .
{signature_p_2}
Viktoriya Maradudina Armen Harutyunyan Acting Deputy R egistrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention
( inadequate conditions of detention )
No.
Application no. Date of introduction
Applicant ’ s name
Year of birth
Representative ’ s name and location
Date of the
applicant ’ s
last
letter to the
Court
Date of the
Court ’ s
registered
letter
Date of receipt
of the registered
letter
New time-limit
for
submission of
observations
by the applicant
Date of the
applicant ’ s
release
from prison
37480/16
20/07/2016
Ionuţ -Silviu SAVIN
1994Sandor-Laszlo Pal
Gloucester
26/10/2020
26/11/2020
02/12/2020
According to the official website of
the United Kingdom ’ s
Postal Service
07/01/2021
11/07/2017
42340/16
04/10/2016
Marius IONAȘC
1985
21/11/2016
17/09/2020
30/09/2020
Illegible signature
29/10/2020
15/05/2019
55793/16
09/11/2016
Petrea ALBU
1972
12/01/2017
22/09/2020
02/10/2020
Signed by relative
03/11/2020
13/11/2019
© European Union,
https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026
