Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

ARHIRE AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

Doc ref: 14094/15, 39249/15, 2828/16, 7932/16, 35226/16, 37695/16, 40683/16, 41256/16, 42971/16, 46337/16, 49... • ECHR ID: 001-212746

Document date: September 23, 2021

  • Inbound citations: 2
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 4

ARHIRE AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

Doc ref: 14094/15, 39249/15, 2828/16, 7932/16, 35226/16, 37695/16, 40683/16, 41256/16, 42971/16, 46337/16, 49... • ECHR ID: 001-212746

Document date: September 23, 2021

Cited paragraphs only

FOURTH SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 14094/15 Bogdan Sorin ARHIRE against Romania and 16 other applications

(see appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 23 September 2021 as a Committee composed of:

Armen Harutyunyan, President, Jolien Schukking, Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,

Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of applicants is set out in the appended table.

The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”).

THE LAW

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows:

“No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”

The Government argued that the applicants had lost their victim status because they had benefitted from the remedy offered by Law no. 169/2017 amending and completing Law no. 254/2013 on the execution of sentences. They asked the Court to reject the present applications for being incompatible ratione personae with the provisions of the Convention.

The applicants disagreed claiming that the compensation awarded was insufficient.

The Court notes that in a recent decision Dîrjan and Ştefan v. Romania ((dec.), nos. 14224/15 and 50977/15, 15 April 2020) it has examined similar applications as the ones in the present case and declared them inadmissible considering that the applicants had lost their victim status. The Court noted that Law no. 169/2017 amending and completing Law no. 254/2013 on the execution of sentences, adopted following the pilot judgment in the case of Rezmiveș and Others v. Romania (nos. 61467/12 and 3 others, 25 April 2017) and in force between October 2017 and December 2019, had been an effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention in Romanian prisons. More specifically, the above law had set forth a compensatory remedy, available for periods of detention ranging from 2012 to 2019 and allowing the deduction of six days for 30 days spent in conditions of detention that fell short of standards compatible with Article 3 of the Convention (see Dîrjan and Ştefan , cited above, § 28). This benefit had impacted on the term of the prison sentences giving the detainees the opportunity of earlier release on parole.

Turning to the circumstances of the present cases, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on their admissibility of those complaints. The above-mentioned remedy was available to the applicants in the present applications and, indeed, they benefitted from it. Thus, on different dates, the domestic authorities, applying the provisions described in the abovementioned decision Dîrjan and Ştefan , awarded compensation, through the reduction of days, to the applicants for the entire period of detention spent in inadequate conditions of which they complained (for further details see the appended table). Furthermore, the applicants were released from prison or were transferred to detention facilities they did not complain about.

The Court is therefore satisfied that the applicants have been afforded adequate redress and can no longer claim to be victims of a violation of their rights under Article 3 of the Convention, insofar as the conditions of their detention, described in the appended table, are concerned. It follows that the applications in this part are incompatible ratione personae with the provisions of the Convention and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention.

In applications nos. 14094/15, 7932/16, 35226/16, 37695/16, 40683/16, 41256/16, 42971/16, 46337/16, 56889/16, 61263/16 and 61779/16 , the applicants also raised other complaints under Article 3 of the Convention, including, in some of them, related to the conditions of their detention during periods preceding the start date specified in the appended table and under Article 8 of the Convention.

The Court has examined these complaints and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto.

It follows that this part of the abovementioned applications must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Declares the applications inadmissible.

Done in English and notified in writing on 14 October 2021.

{signature_p_2}

Viktoriya Maradudina Armen Harutyunyan Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention)

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant’s name

Year of birth

Representative’s name and location

Facility

Start and end date

Duration

Domestic compensation awarded

(in days)

based on total period calculated domestically

14094/15

06/07/2015

Bogdan Sorin ARHIRE

1983Miercurea Ciuc Prison

04/01/2013 to

25/08/2016

3 year(s) and 7 month(s) and 22 day(s)

420 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent in inadequate conditions from 24/07/2012 to 10/08/2018

39249/15

21/08/2015

Ion POPII

1972Colibași and Rahova Prisons

07/01/2014 to

03/11/2017

3 year(s) and 9 month(s) and 28 day(s)

264 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent in inadequate conditions from 07/01/2014 to 03/11/2017

2828/16

25/01/2016

7932/16

09/03/2016

Tiberiu-Carol KALLAI

1981Vasile RareÅŸ Biro

Satu Mare

Oradea and Satu Mare Prisons

21/04/2015 to

03/05/2018

3 year(s) and 13 day(s)

414 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent in inadequate conditions between 24/07/2012 - 03/05/2018

35226/16

13/07/2016

Cosmin-Sarafim PAÅžCAN

1983Galați and Brăila Prisons

08/04/2014 to

06/03/2018

3 year(s) and 10 month(s) and 27 day(s)

408 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent in inadequate conditions between 24/07/2012 - 06/03/2018

37695/16

20/07/2016

Constantin ENACHE

1977Irina Maria Peter

Bucharest

Giurgiu and Jilava Prisons

13/02/2015 to

20/12/2018

3 year(s) and 10 month(s) and 8 day(s)

534 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent in inadequate conditions between 24/07/2012 - 23/12/2019

40683/16

09/08/2016

George CRISTEA

1963Irina Maria Peter

Bucharest

Giurgiu and Jilava Prisons

07/09/2015 to

08/01/2018

2 year(s) and 4 month(s) and 2 day(s)

306 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent in inadequate conditions between 23/07/2013 - 10/01/2018

41256/16

02/08/2016

Ion TUDOR

1982Poarta Albă and Tulcea Prisons

03/06/2013 to

30/10/2019

6 year(s) and 4 month(s) and 28 day(s)

498 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent in inadequate conditions between 31/07/2012 - 30/10/2019

42971/16

31/10/2016

Titus ILIUȚĂ

1951Bistrița and Gherla Prisons

13/01/2016 to

29/12/2017

1 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 17 day(s)

138 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent in inadequate conditions between 13/01/2016 - 29/12/2017

46337/16

01/08/2016

Ionel ZAMFIRACHE

1973Iași Prison

05/04/2013 to

01/04/2014

11 month(s) and 28 day(s)

Iași and Galați Prisons

02/02/2016 to

20/12/2017

1 year(s) and 10 month(s) and 19 day(s)

336 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent in inadequate conditions between 24/07/2012 - 23/12/2019

49838/16

14/01/2017

Ciprian-Nicu FLOREA

1976Irina Maria Peter

Bucharest

Rahova Prison and Jilava Prison Hospital

06/05/2016 to

08/03/2018

1 year(s) and 10 month(s) and 3 day(s)

96 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent in inadequate conditions from 06/05/2016 to 08/03/2018

50846/16

07/10/2016

Anghel PATRAȘCU

1960Ionela Mărgărit

Bucharest

Galați County Police Station and Brăila and Galați Prisons

19/07/2013 to

02/10/2018

5 year(s) and 2 month(s) and 14 day(s)

378 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent in inadequate conditions between 19/07/2013 - 02/10/2018

54020/16

15/11/2016

Marian MOHAN

1953Magda-Mihaela Nicolae

Cornu de Jos

Bucharest Central Arrest, Rahova and Ploiești Prisons

15/10/2014 to

31/05/2017

2 year(s) and 7 month(s) and 17 day(s)

354 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent in inadequate conditions from 15/10/2014 to 26/11/2019

56889/16

22/03/2017

Ioan-Octavian POPOVICI

1982Liviu Radu Popovici

Oradea

Satu Mare Prison

16/09/2016 to

18/09/2018

2 year(s) and 3 day(s)

438 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent in inadequate conditions between 24/07/2012 - 18/09/2018

61263/16

14/11/2016

Valeriu PISCUREANU

1964Craiova and Târgu Jiu Prisons

16/01/2014 to

25/09/2018

4 year(s) and 8 month(s) and 10 day(s)

426 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent in inadequate conditions from 24/07/2012 to 25/09/2018

61779/16

19/10/2016

Mădălin-Ștefan ȘTIRB

1990Vasile RareÅŸ Biro

Satu Mare

Oradea and Satu Mare Prisons

14/09/2012 to

01/11/2017

5 year(s) and 1 month(s) and 19 day(s)

372 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent in inadequate conditions between 24/07/2012 - 01/11/2017

62722/16

14/12/2016

Ștefan-Adrian POPESCU

1984Irina Maria Peter

Bucharest

Bucharest Central Arrest, Bucharest Police detention facilities no. 13, Rahova and Giurgiu Prisons

14/12/2012 to

11/04/2019

6 year(s) and 3 month(s) and 29 day(s)

444 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent in inadequate conditions from 14/12/2012 to 11/04/2019

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846