Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

IANCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

Doc ref: 51301/16, 52526/16, 59169/16, 60946/16, 62102/16, 69433/16, 13991/17, 30362/17, 33281/17, 39800/17, ... • ECHR ID: 001-213026

Document date: October 7, 2021

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

IANCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

Doc ref: 51301/16, 52526/16, 59169/16, 60946/16, 62102/16, 69433/16, 13991/17, 30362/17, 33281/17, 39800/17, ... • ECHR ID: 001-213026

Document date: October 7, 2021

Cited paragraphs only

FOURTH SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 51301/16 Liviu-Gheorghe IANCU against Romania and 11 other applications

(see appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 7 October 2021 as a Committee composed of:

Armen Harutyunyan, President, Jolien Schukking, Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix.

The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received by the Court.

By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.

No reply to these letters has been received by the Court (see details in the appended table). All the applicants have been released from prison.

THE LAW

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases.

Done in English and notified in writing on 28 October 2021.

{signature_p_2}

Viktoriya Maradudina Armen Harutyunyan Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention)

No.

Application no. Date of introduction

Applicant’s name

Year of birth

Representative’s name and location

Date of the

applicant’s last

letter to the

Court

Date of the

Court’s

registered

letter

Date of receipt

of the registered

letter

New time-limit

for submission of observations

by the applicant

Date of the

applicant’s

release

from prison

51301/16

10/11/2016

Liviu-Gheorghe IANCU

1977

12/05/2017

03/06/2021

Returned to the Court on 30/06/2021

(according to the official website of Romania’s Postal Service)

01/07/2021

26/04/2017

52526/16

07/11/2016

Ion Răzvan TUDOSĂ

1979

19/09/2017

07/07/2021

Returned to the Court on 14/08/2021

(according to the official website of Romania’s Postal Service)

04/08/2021

29/08/2017

59169/16

26/10/2016

Marin NEGOIȚĂ

1973

26/10/2016

07/07/2021

19/07/2021

Illegible signature

04/08/2021

13/12/2016

60946/16

14/11/2016

Alexandru ROTARIU

1983

29/05/2017

07/07/2021

Returned to the Court as “unclaimed” on 07/09/2021

04/08/2021

03/05/2017

62102/16

17/11/2016

Alexandru DUMITRU

1962

02/03/2017

07/07/2021

16/07/2021

Signed for receipt by the applicant’s daughter

04/08/2021

24/10/2017

69433/16

16/12/2016

Constantin OPRINA

1982

08/03/2017

07/05/2021

The letter was sent to the prison address and returned to the Court on 19/07/2021 as “applicant released”

A previous letter sent to the home address had been handed over to the applicant’s mother on 05/10/2020

04/06/2021

29/08/2018

13991/17

23/03/2017

Doina-Maria DOBRE

1974Gina-Nicoleta Ilie

Bucharest

23/03/2017

03/06/2021

Returned to the Court on 01/07/2021

(according to the official website of Romania’s Postal Service)

01/07/2021

06/12/2016

30362/17

04/04/2017

Constantin SEICA

1967

04/04/2017

07/07/2021

21/07/2021

Illegible signature

04/08/2021

04/10/2016

33281/17

10/06/2017

Victor STANCIU

1982Doru Ristea

Bucharest

10/06/2017

12/05/2021

Returned to the Court on 05/06/2021

(according to the official website of Romania’s Postal Service)

09/06/2021

12/01/2017

39800/17

22/05/2017

Ferencz-Alfréd BARICZ

1973

22/05/2017

07/07/2021

22/07/2021

Signed for receipt by the applicant

04/08/2021

19/05/2017

43971/17

12/06/2017

Victor BĂLĂCEANU

1956

10/10/2017

07/07/2021

Returned to the Court as “unclaimed” on 07/09/2021

04/08/2021

26/09/2017

9193/20

27/03/2020

Alexandru ȘTEFAN

1979

27/03/2020

11/05/2021

Returned to the Court on 10/06/2021

(according to the official website of Romania’s Postal Service)

08/06/2021

02/09/2020

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846