Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

MIROSHNYK v. UKRAINE

Doc ref: 44917/04 • ECHR ID: 001-91601

Document date: February 17, 2009

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

MIROSHNYK v. UKRAINE

Doc ref: 44917/04 • ECHR ID: 001-91601

Document date: February 17, 2009

Cited paragraphs only

FIFTH SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 44917/04 by Valentyna Mykolayivna MIROSHNYK against Ukraine

The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 17 February 2009 as a Chamber composed of:

Peer Lorenzen , President, Rait Maruste , Karel Jungwiert , Mark Villiger , Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska , Zdravka Kalaydjieva , judges, Stanislav Shevchuk , ad hoc judge, and Claudia Westerdiek, Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 27 December 2003,

Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

PROCEDURE

The application was lodged by Mr s Valentyna Mykolayivna Miroshnyk , a Ukrainian national who was born in 1949 and live s in the Kirovograd Region . The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Yuriy Zaytsev .

The applicant complain ed under Article s 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the non-enforcement of the judgment of 15 June 2001 of the Oleksandriya Town Court in her favour.

Notice of the application was given to the Government, who submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits of the case on 21 July 2008.

By letter of 11 August 2008, the applicant was invited to submit her observations in reply together with any claims for just satisfaction by 22 September 2008. However, the applicant failed to do so. Moreover, she failed to respond to a registered letter dated 27 October 2008, warning the applicant of the possibility that her case might be struck out of the Court ’ s list.

THE LAW

Having regard to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, the Court concludes that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the examination of th is application to be continued.

For these reasons, the Court unanimously

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

Claudia Westerdiek Peer Lorenzen Registrar President

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846