Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

IVANOV v. BULGARIA

Doc ref: 33551/04 • ECHR ID: 001-93787

Document date: June 30, 2009

  • Inbound citations: 1
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

IVANOV v. BULGARIA

Doc ref: 33551/04 • ECHR ID: 001-93787

Document date: June 30, 2009

Cited paragraphs only

FIFTH SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 3355 1 /04 by Ivan Penchev IVANOV against Bulgaria

The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 30 J une 2009 as a Chamber composed of:

Peer Lorenzen , President, Rait Maruste , Karel Jungwiert , Renate Jaeger , Mark Villiger , Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska , Zdravka Kalaydjieva , judges, and Claudia Westerdiek, Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 9 September 2004,

Having regard to the partial decision of 6 January 2009,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application lodged with the Court on 9 September 2004 by Mr Ivan Penchev Ivanov , a Bulgari an national who was born in 1954 and lives in Varna . The Bulgarian Government are represented by their Agent, Mrs N. Nikolova, of the Ministry of Justice.

On 6 January 2009 the Court declared the application partly inadmissible and decided to communicate the applicant ’ s complaint s concerning the length of the criminal proceedings against him and the lack of effective remedies in that regard.

On 17 February 2009 the applicant informed the Court that he wished to withdraw the application as he had initiated domestic proceedings against the State for damages stemming from the criminal proceedings against him.

THE LAW

The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue his application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court unanimously

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

             Claudia Westerdiek Peer Lorenzen Registrar President

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846