Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

GLUKMANN v. ESTONIA

Doc ref: 45659/08 • ECHR ID: 001-93893

Document date: July 7, 2009

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

GLUKMANN v. ESTONIA

Doc ref: 45659/08 • ECHR ID: 001-93893

Document date: July 7, 2009

Cited paragraphs only

FIFTH SECTION

Application no. 45659/08 by Zhan GLÜKMANN against Estonia lodged on 17 September 2008

The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 7 July 2009 as a Chamber composed of:

Peer Lorenzen , President, Renate Jaeger , Karel Jungwiert , Rait Maruste , Mark Villiger , Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska , Zdravka Kalaydjieva , judges, and Stephen Phillips , Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 17 September 2008,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

PROCEDURE

The applicant, Mr Zhan Glükmann , is an Estonian national who was born in 1971 and lives in Tallinn . He wa s rep resented before the Court by Ms K. Namm , a lawyer practising in Rakvere .

The applicant complained under Article s 5 § 3 and 6 § 1 of the Convention about the length of his detention and the length of the criminal proceedings.

On an unspecified date in 2009 the applicant and the prosecution reached a plea bargain agreement according to which the applicant was sentenced to seven years ’ and six months ’ imprisonment.

On 17 June 2009 the applicant ’ s representative informed the Court that the applicant wanted to withdraw the application since he had concluded a plea bargain agreement in the criminal case against him.

THE LAW

The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue his application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court unanimously

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

Stephen Phillips Peer Lorenzen Deputy Registrar President

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846