FIFTH SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 31631/07 by Nadica RISTOVSKA and Others against the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 8 June 2010 as a Chamber composed of :

Peer Lorenzen , President, Renate Jaeger , Karel Jungwiert , Rait Maruste , Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre , Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska , Zdravka Kalaydjieva , judges, and Claudia Westerdiek , Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 11 July 2007,

Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

PROCEDURE

The application was lodged by Ms Nadica Ristovska , Ms Elizabeta Prnarova , Ms Vesna Klincarova , Ms Luiza Sokolova , Ms Vasa Najdovska and Ms Dragica Zdraveva , are Macedonian nationals who were born in 1961 , 1961, 1960, 1964, 1964 and 1964 respectively and live in Veles . They were repr esented before the Court by Mr B. Grozdanovski , a lawyer practising in Skopje . The Macedonian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs R. Lazareska Gerovska .

On 7 January 2010 the Court decided to communicate the applicants ' complaint concerning the length of civil proceedings in which they claimed pension and disability contributions . The proceedings began on 18 December 1996 and ended on 11 April 2007 (the date of service) .

On 18 February 2010 and 14 April 2010 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicant s agreed to waive any further claims against the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia in respect of the facts giving rise to this application against an undertaking by the Government to pay each of them 4,800 euros to cover any non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, which would be converted into Macedonian D enars at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and free of any taxes that may be applicable. This sum would be payable to the personal accounts of the applicants within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment would constitute the final resolution of the case.

THE LAW

The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no public policy reasons to justify a continued examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention).

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

             Claudia Westerdiek Peer Lorenzen Registrar President