Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF TETERINY v. RUSSIA
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2019/2006 of 21 December 2006 amending Regulations (EC) Nos 2058/96, 327/98 and 955/2005 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas for imports of rice
CASE OF MAMERE AGAINST FRANCE
CASE OF SEVKET YILMAZ v. TURKEY
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 February 1986. Androniki Vlachou v Court of Auditors of the European Communities.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 902/96 of 20 May 1996 concerning the classification of certain goods in the combined nomenclautre
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 October 2009. Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain.
CASE OF ELECTION MONITORING AND DEMOCRACY EDUCATION CENTRE AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
Council Regulation (EC) No 1683/95 of 29 May 1995 laying down a uniform format for visas
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 751/82 of 31 March 1982 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1054/78 following the fixing of new rates of exchange to be applied in agriculture for the Belgian franc, the Luxembourg franc, the German mark and the Dutch guildeR

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 January 2022. Thelen Technopark Berlin GmbH v MN.

C-261/20 • 62020CJ0261 • ECLI:EU:C:2022:33

Inbound citations: 44
•
Cited paragraphs: 14
•
Outbound citations: 80

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

Fk unique documents citing • uu citations total to Pi paragraphs

Outbound citations

Zv unique documents cited • 4U citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846