Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF PAPILLO v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF ARLEWIN v. SWEDEN
Commission Regulation (EC) No 157/2002 of 28 January 2002 derogating from Regulation (EC) No 2316/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1251/1999 with regard to set-aside as a result of the adverse weather conditions in some Community regions
MLYNEK v. AUSTRIA
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1439/95 of 26 June 1995 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3013/89 as regards the import and export of products in the sheepmeat and goatmeat sector
ARSLAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF ANDREJEVA v. LATVIA
Council Directive 94/29/EC of 23 June 1994 amending the Annexes to Directives 86/362/EEC and 86/363/EEC on the fixing of maximum levels for pesticide residues in and on cereals and foodstuffs of animal origin respectively
MARKOVA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
CASE OF LES AUTHENTIKS AND SUPRAS AUTEUIL 91 v. FRANCE

Search
document

Document text Analytics

CASE OF LES AUTHENTIKS AND SUPRAS AUTEUIL 91 v. FRANCE

Doc ref: 4696/11;4703/11 • ECHR ID: 001-168394

Document date: October 27, 2016

Inbound citations: 16
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF LES AUTHENTIKS AND SUPRAS AUTEUIL 91 v. FRANCE

Doc ref: 4696/11;4703/11 • ECHR ID: 001-168394

Document date: October 27, 2016

Cited paragraphs only

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846