Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

D. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

Doc ref: 12084/86 • ECHR ID: 001-1005

Document date: March 13, 1989

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

D. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

Doc ref: 12084/86 • ECHR ID: 001-1005

Document date: March 13, 1989

Cited paragraphs only



Application No. 12084/86

by G.D.

against the United Kingdom

        The European Commission of Human Rights sitting in private on

13 March 1989, the following members being present:

                MM.  C.A. NØRGAARD, President

                     S. TRECHSEL

                     F. ERMACORA

                     G. SPERDUTI

                     E. BUSUTTIL

                     A.S. GÖZÜBÜYÜK

                     A. WEITZEL

                     J.C. SOYER

                     H.G. SCHERMERS

                     H. DANELIUS

                     G. BATLINER

                     J. CAMPINOS

                     H. VANDENBERGHE

                Mrs.  G.H. THUNE

                Sir  Basil HALL

                MM.  F. MARTINEZ

                     C.L. ROZAKIS

                Mrs.  J. LIDDY

                Mr.  L. LOUCAIDES

                Mr.  H.C. KRÜGER, Secretary to the Commission

        Having regard to Article 25 of the Convention for the

Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;

        Having regard to the application introduced on 30 May 1985

by G.D. against the United Kingdom and registered on 3 April

1986 under file No. 12084/86;

- ii -

12084/86

        Having regard to:

-       reports provided for in Rule 40 of the Rules of Procedure of

        the Commission;

-       the Commission's decision of 18 July 1986 to bring the

        application to the notice of the respondent Government

        and invite them to submit written observations on its

        admissibility and merits ;

     -  the information provided by the applicant's representative

        on 24 February 1989 ;

     -  confirmation of that information by the respondent Government

        on 28 February 1989 ;

        Having deliberated;

        Decides as follows:

THE FACTS

        The applicant is a British citizen, born in 1939 in Jersey.

He is a financial adviser and lives in Oxfordshire.  He is represented

before the Commission by Mr.  D. Lequesne, a lawyer with Messrs.

Viberts, Advocates, St.  Helier, Jersey.

        The applicant complained to the Commission about the length of

criminal proceedings against him (eight years and three months), which

were eventually abandoned.  He claimed to be a victim of a violation

of Articles 6, 8 and 14 of the Convention.

PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COMMISSION

        The application was introduced on 30 May 1985 and registered

on 3 April 1986.  After a preliminary examination of the case by the

Rapporteur, the Commission considered the admissibility of the

application on 18 July 1986.  It decided to give notice of the

application to the respondent Government, pursuant to Rule 42 para. 2

(b) of its Rules of Procedure, and to invite the parties to submit

their written observations on admissibility and merits.  However,

rather than submitting such observations, on 27 October 1986 the

Government requested the Commission's assistance in seeking a

satisfactory settlement of the applicant's complaints.  There then

followed lengthy exchanges between the parties through the Commission,

as well as direct negotiations between the applicant's representative

and the Attorney General of Jersey.  On 24 February 1989 the

applicant's representative informed the Commission that the case had

been settled.  He confirmed on 28 February 1989 his client's wish to

withdraw the case.  That same day the Government also confirmed that a

satisfactory financial agreement had been reached between the parties.

REASONS FOR THE DECISION

        The Commission notes that the parties have now reached a

satisfactory financial settlement and that the applicant wishes to

withdraw his application.  It finds no reasons of a general character

affecting the observance of the Convention which require retention of

the application.  Accordingly the Commission accedes to the

applicant's request to withdraw his case.

        For these reasons, the Commission

        DECIDES TO STRIKE THE APPLICATION OFF ITS LIST OF CASES.

    Secretary to the Commission         President of the Commission

            (H.C. KRÜGER)                      (C.A. NØRGAARD)

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846