B. v. THE NETHERLANDS
Doc ref: 15606/89 • ECHR ID: 001-1746
Document date: April 1, 1992
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
Application No. 15606/89
by H.B.
against the Netherlands
The European Commission of Human Rights (Second Chamber) sitting
in private on 1 April 1992, the following members being present:
MM. S. TRECHSEL, President of the Second Chamber
G. JÖRUNDSSON
A. WEITZEL
J.-C. SOYER
H. G. SCHERMERS
H. DANELIUS
Mrs. G. H. THUNE
MM. F. MARTINEZ
L. LOUCAIDES
J.-C. GEUS
A.V. ALMEIDA RIBEIRO
Mr. K. ROGGE, Secretary to the Second Chamber
Having regard to Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection
of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;
Having regard to the application introduced on 5 October 1989 by
H.B. against the Netherlands and registered on 12 October 1989 under
file No. 15606/89;
Having regard to the report provided for in Rule 47 of the Rules
of Procedure of the Commission;
Having deliberated;
Decides as follows:
THE FACTS
The applicant is a Colombian national, born in 1952 and at
present residing in Colombia. At the time of the introduction of the
application she was detained in a women's penitentiary in Amsterdam,
having been convicted for drug related offences. Before the Commission,
she is represented by Mrs. M.D. van Aller, a lawyer practising in
Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
The applicant originally complained that the Dutch authorities'
refusal of 28 June 1989 to grant her a residence permit to stay with
her Dutch fiancé in the Netherlands and the ensuing expulsion amounted
to a violation of her right to respect for her family life and her
right to marry and found a family as she was expecting a baby.
In the meanwhile the applicant has been expelled to Colombia on
18 October 1989 where she married her Dutch fiancé and lived with him
and their child. It appears that at present they are divorced.
PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COMMISSION
The application was introduced on 5 October 1989 and registered
on 12 October 1989.
On 13 October 1989 the Commission decided not to make an
indication under Rule 36 of its Rules of Procedure to the respondent
Government.
By letter of 28 January 1992 the applicant's representative
informed the Commission that the applicant wishes to withdraw the
application.
REASONS FOR THE DECISION
Having regard to Article 30 para. 1 (a) of the Convention, the
Commission notes that the applicant does not intend to pursue this
petition since she is divorced and lives in Colombia. It finds no
special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in
the Convention which require examination of the application to be
continued, in accordance with Article 30 para. 1 in fine of the
Convention.
For these reasons, the Commission, unanimously
DECIDES TO STRIKE THE APPLICATION OFF ITS LIST OF CASES.
Secretary to the Second Chamber President of the Second Chamber
(K. ROGGE) (S. TRECHSEL)
LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
