Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

MLYNEK v. AUSTRIA

Doc ref: 19513/92 • ECHR ID: 001-1409

Document date: October 20, 1992

  • Inbound citations: 7
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 2

MLYNEK v. AUSTRIA

Doc ref: 19513/92 • ECHR ID: 001-1409

Document date: October 20, 1992

Cited paragraphs only



                      Application No. 19513/92

                      by H. MLYNEK

                      against Austria

      The European Commission of Human Rights (Second Chamber) sitting

in private on 20 October 1992, the following members being present:

             MM.  S. TRECHSEL, President of the Second Chamber

                  G. JÖRUNDSSON

                  A. WEITZEL

                  J.-C. SOYER

                  H. G. SCHERMERS

                  H. DANELIUS

             Mrs. G. H. THUNE

             MM.  F. MARTINEZ

                  L. LOUCAIDES

                  J.-C. GEUS

             Mr.  K. ROGGE, Secretary to the Second Chamber

      Having regard to Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection

of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;

      Having regard to the application introduced on 23 January 1992

by Hannes MLYNEK against Austria and registered on 10 February 1992

under file No. 19513/92;

      Having regard to the report provided for in Rule 47 of the Rules

of Procedure of the Commission;

      Having deliberated;

      Decides as follows:

THE FACTS

      The applicant is an Austrian citizen born in 1943.  He lives in

Vienna.

      Criminal proceedings were introduced against the applicant on

21 March 1980.  On 10 March 1988 the Commission found that the

proceedings against the applicant had not been determined within a

reasonable time to 10 March 1988 (No. 11688/85, Comm. Rep. 10.3.88).

On 9 December 1991 the Commission found that, in respect of the

proceedings to that date, Article 6 had not been complied with (No.

15016/89, Comm. Rep. 9.12.91).

      On 5 July 1991, the applicant's third trial at first instance

began, following the quashing of his second conviction.  On

16 September 1991 the applicant was found guilty of delay in opening

insolvency proceedings.

      When the present application was introduced, the applicant had

not received the written judgment.

COMPLAINTS

      The applicant again alleges a violation of Article 6 para. 1 of

the Convention.

PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COMMISSION

      On 13 May 1992 the Commission decided to request written

observations on the admissibility and merits of the application.

      On 15 September 1992 the applicant and the respondent Government

entered into an agreement whereby the applicant's request for costs

under Section 9(2) of the Courts (Recovery) Act 1962 (Gerichtliches

Einbringungsgesetz) would be granted.  The applicant declared both the

present application, and Application No. 15016/89, to be settled.

REASONS FOR THE DECISION

      The Commission finds that the matter before it has been resolved

and that the applicant therefore no longer intends to pursue his

petition, within the meaning of Article 30 para. 1 (a) and (b) of the

Convention.  Respect for human rights as defined in the Convention does

not require the examination of the application to be continued.

      For these reasons the Commission unanimously

      Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

Secretary to the Second Chamber        President of the Second Chamber

       (K. ROGGE)                             (S. TRECHSEL)

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255