P.W. v. AUSTRIA
Doc ref: 22604/93 • ECHR ID: 001-45851
Document date: October 16, 1996
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
EUROPEAN COMMISSION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
FIRST CHAMBER
Application No. 22604/93
P. W.
against
Austria
REPORT OF THE COMMISSION
(adopted on 16 October 1996)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
INTRODUCTION ............................................. 1
PART I: STATEMENT OF THE FACTS .......................... 2
PART II: SOLUTION REACHED ................................ 3
INTRODUCTION
1. This Report relates to the application introduced under
Article 25 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human
Rights and Fundamental Freedoms by P. W. against Austria on
11 August 1993. It was registered on 10 September 1993 under file
No. 22604/93.
2. The applicant was represented by Mr. W.-D. Arnold, a lawyer
practising in Vienna.
3. The Government of Austria were represented by their Agent,
Mr. F. Cede, Ambassador, Head of the International Law Department at
the Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
4. On 16 January 1996 the Commission (First Chamber) declared the
application admissible. It then proceeded to carry out its task
under Article 28 para. 1 of the Convention which provides as follows:
"In the event of the Commission accepting a petition referred to
it:
a. it shall, with a view to ascertaining the facts, undertake
together with the representatives of the parties an
examination of the petition and, if need be, an
investigation, for the effective conduct of which the
States concerned shall furnish all necessary facilities,
after an exchange of views with the Commission;
b. it shall at the same time place itself at the disposal of
the parties concerned with a view to securing a friendly
settlement of the matter on the basis of respect for Human
Rights as defined in this Convention."
5. The Commission (First Chamber) found that the parties had reached
a friendly settlement of the case and on 16 October 1996 it adopted
this Report, which, in accordance with Article 28 para. 2 of the
Convention, is confined to a brief statement of the facts and of the
solution reached.
6. The following members were present when the Report was adopted:
Mrs. J. LIDDY, President
MM. M.P. PELLONPÄÄ
E. BUSUTTIL
A. WEITZEL
B. MARXER
G.B. REFFI
B. CONFORTI
N. BRATZA
I. BÉKÉS
G. RESS
A. PERENIC
C. BÎRSAN
K. HERNDL
M. VILA AMIGÓ
PART I
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS
7. The applicant, an Austrian national born in 1942 and residing in
Vienna, is a tax consultant (Wirtschaftstreuhänder) by profession.
8. On 8 January 1990 the Linz Tax Office (Finanzamt) decided to
institute criminal proceedings under the Code of Financial Offences
(Finanzstrafgesetz) against the applicant as it suspected him of having
aided and abetted one of his clients to evade taxes.
9. On 9 May 1990 the Upper Austria Regional Directorate for Finance
(Finanzlandesdirektion) dismissed the applicant's appeal against the
above decision.
10. On 29 May 1990 the applicant filed a complaint with the
Administrative Court (Verwaltungsgerichtshof) against the Regional
Directorate's decision of 9 May 1990.
11. On 22 February 1994 the Administrative Court quashed the Regional
Directorate's decision of 9 May 1990 and remitted the case back to the
Regional Directorate.
12. On 7 November 1994 the Regional Directorate decided again on the
applicant's appeal of 12 January 1990 and discontinued the criminal
proceedings.
13. The applicant complains that in the criminal proceedings
instituted against him, he did not receive a hearing within a
reasonable time as required by Article 6 para. 1 of the Convention.
PART II
SOLUTION REACHED
14. Following the decision on the admissibility of the application,
the Commission placed itself at the disposal of the parties with a view
to securing a friendly settlement in accordance with
Article 28 para. 1 (b) of the Convention and invited the parties to
submit any proposals they wished to make.
15. In accordance with the usual practice, the Chamber Secretary,
acting on the Commission's instructions, contacted the parties to
explore the possibilities of reaching a friendly settlement.
16. By letters of 24 June 1996 and 23 August 1996 the parties
informed the Commission that they had agreed on the terms of a friendly
settlement and submitted the following declaration:
17. "Statements of the parties with a view to a friendly settlement
With reference to Article 28 para. 1 (b) of the European
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,
the parties in the proceedings concerning Application No. 22604/93,
lodged by Mr. P. W., declare with a view to a friendly settlement,
reached with the assistance of the European Commission of Human Rights,
as follows:
1. The Government of the Republic of Austria will pay to the
applicant a sum of altogether AS 60,000 as compensation in
respect of any possible claims relating to the present
application. This sum includes AS 20,000 in respect of counsel's
fees and expenses incurred in the proceedings before the
Commission.
This amount will be paid to the applicant's representative
Mr. Wolf-Dieter Arnold in Vienna.
2. The applicant declares his application settled.
3. The applicant waives any further claims against the
Republic of Austria relating to the present application."
"Erklärungen der Parteien zur gütlichen Regelung
In der Beschwerdesache Nr. 22604/93 des Herrn P. W. einigen sich
die Parteien unter Bezugnahme auf Artikel 28 Abs. 1 lit. b der
Europäischen Konvention zum Schutze der Menschenrechte und
Grundfreiheiten und unter Mitwirkung der Europäischen Kommission für
Menschenrechte auf die nachstehende gütliche Regelung:
1. Die österreichische Regierung zahlt dem Beschwerdeführer
als Ausgleich für sämtliche etwaige Ansprüche im Zusammenhang mit
der vorliegenden Beschwerde einen Gesamtbetrag von öS 60,000.
Dieser Betrag umfaßt öS 20,000 hinsichtlich der Gebühren und
Auslagen, die im Rahmen des Verfahrens vor der Kommission
entstanden sind.
Dieser Betrag wird an den Verfahrensbevollmächtigten des
Beschwerdeführers Herrn Rechtsanwalt Dr. Wolf-Dieter Arnold in
Wien überwiesen.
2. Der Beschwerdeführer erklärt seine oben genannte Beschwerde
als erledigt.
3. Der Beschwerdeführer verzichtet auf die Geltendmachung
allfälliger weiterer Forderungen gegen die Republik Österreich
im Zusammenhang mit dem der Beschwerde zugrundeliegenden
Sachverhalt."
18. At its session on 16 October 1996, the Commission noted that the
parties had reached an agreement regarding the terms of a settlement.
If further considered, having regard to Article 28 para. 1 (b)
of the Convention, that the friendly settlement of the case had been
secured on the basis of respect for Human Rights as defined in the
Convention.
19. For these reasons, the Commission adopted the present Report.
M.F. BUQUICCHIO J. LIDDY
Secretary President
to the First Chamber of the First Chamber
LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
