Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF PHILIS v. GREECEDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PETTITI
CASE OF KOSAITĖ - ČYPIENĖ AND OTHERS v. LITHUANIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE LAFFRANQUE
Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber), 5 December 2013. Walter Vapenik v Josef Thurner.
Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 March 2011. Herhof-Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 102/92 of 16 January 1992 fixing the export refunds on cereals and on wheat or rye flour, groats and meal
CASE OF KALASHNIKOV v. RUSSIASEPARATE CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE KOVLER
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 125/98 of 16 January 1998 fixing the export refunds on beef and veal
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 January 2018. Maximilian Schrems v Facebook Ireland Limited.
CASE OF TANER KILIÇ v. TURKEY (No. 2) - [Turkish Translation] by Amnesty International
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1516/98 of 15 July 1998 fixing the export refunds on poultrymeat

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber), 6 december 2012.

AstraZeneca AB and AstraZeneca plc v European Commission.

C-457/10 P • 62010CJ0457 • ECLI:EU:C:2012:770

Inbound citations: 33
•
Cited paragraphs: 14
•
Outbound citations: 94

Keywords

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

qu unique documents citing • hg citations total to 5u paragraphs

Outbound citations

7r unique documents cited • Eb citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846