Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF DELI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
CASE OF YOUTH INITIATIVE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AGAINST SERBIA
CASE OF EGILL EINARSSON v. ICELANDDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MOUROU-VIKSTRÖM
CASE OF STEPHENS v. MALTA (no. 2)DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BONELLO
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 83/87 of 13 January 1987 altering the corrective amount applicable to the refund on cereals
CASE OF ALDEGUER TOMÁS v. SPAINSEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KELLER
Council Regulation (EEC) No 1248/92 of 30 April 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self- employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community and Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71
CASE OF VALIULIENĖ v. LITHUANIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE JOÄŒIENÄ–
CASE OF OOO AVRORA MALOETAZHNOE STROITELSTVO v. RUSSIA
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 2 September 2010. European Commission v Scott SA.

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 October 2020. Association française des usagers de banques v Ministre de l'Économie et des Finances.

C-778/18 • 62018CJ0778 • ECLI:EU:C:2020:831

Inbound citations: 5
•
Cited paragraphs: 2
•
Outbound citations: 114

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

u unique documents citing • N citations total to y paragraphs

Outbound citations

Oj unique documents cited • TL5 citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846