Case C-7/16: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 July 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 11 de Vigo — Spain) — Banco Popular Español SA, PL Salvador SARL v María Rita Giráldez Villar, Modesto Martínez Baz (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms — Assignment of a claim — Right of the debtor to extinguish his debt — Conditions governing the exercise of that right)

• 62016CB0007

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 2

Case C-7/16: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 July 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 11 de Vigo — Spain) — Banco Popular Español SA, PL Salvador SARL v María Rita Giráldez Villar, Modesto Martínez Baz (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms — Assignment of a claim — Right of the debtor to extinguish his debt — Conditions governing the exercise of that right)

• 62016CB0007

Cited paragraphs only

19.9.2016

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/17

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 July 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 11 de Vigo — Spain) — Banco Popular Español SA, PL Salvador SARL v María Rita Giráldez Villar, Modesto Martínez Baz

(Case C-7/16) ( 1 )

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Directive 93/13/EEC - Unfair terms - Assignment of a claim - Right of the debtor to extinguish his debt - Conditions governing the exercise of that right))

(2016/C 343/26)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 11 de Vigo

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Banco Popular Español SA, PL Salvador SARL

Defendants: María Rita Giráldez Villar, Modesto Martínez Baz

Operative part of the order

Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts must be interpreted as meaning that it does not apply to national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, relating to the right of the person owing a debt that has been assigned by the creditor to a third party to extinguish his debt by reimbursing to that third party the price paid by the latter in respect of that assignment.

( 1 ) OJ C 118, 4.4.2016 .

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant