Case T-105/13: Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2014 — Ludwig Schokolade v OHIM — Immergut (TrinkFix) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark TrinkFix — Earlier national and Community word marks Drinkfit — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Similarity of the goods and services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009)

• 62013TA0105

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 2

Case T-105/13: Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2014 — Ludwig Schokolade v OHIM — Immergut (TrinkFix) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark TrinkFix — Earlier national and Community word marks Drinkfit — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Similarity of the goods and services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009)

• 62013TA0105

Cited paragraphs only

9.2.2015

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/46

Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2014 — Ludwig Schokolade v OHIM — Immergut (TrinkFix)

(Case T-105/13) ( 1 )

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark TrinkFix - Earlier national and Community word marks Drinkfit - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Similarity of the goods and services - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2015/C 046/57)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Ludwig Schokolade GmbH & Co. KG (Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) (represented by: S. Fischer and A. Brodkorb, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Pohlmann, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Immergut GmbH & Co. KG (Elsdorf, Germany) (represented by: G. Schoenen, V. Töbelmann and S. Frenz, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 December 2012 (affaire R 34/2012-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Immergut GmbH & Co. KG and Ludwig Schokolade GmbH & Co. KG.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

Dismisses the action;

Orders Ludwig Schokolade GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

( 1 ) OJ C 108, 13.4.2013 .

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant